<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spanish P2P Developer Goes to Court for &#8220;Unfair Competition&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86284/spanish-p2p-developer-goes-to-court-for-unfair-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86284/spanish-p2p-developer-goes-to-court-for-unfair-competition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 1cooldude</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86284/spanish-p2p-developer-goes-to-court-for-unfair-competition/#comment-191061</link>
		<dc:creator>1cooldude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 08:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86284#comment-191061</guid>
		<description>under most international laws, the basic litmus test for these cases to proceed requires one key component; the defendant must have profited from his actions of providing the software.
I&#039;ve done the research on Pablo and as far as i can tell, his software seems to be freeware and nowhere does it mention that he was pocketing any money from his work. My guess is that the recording industry is slowly losing any credibility in the eyes of the law and is showing its signs of desperation. With time, nobody is going to listen or want to address any of their stupid arguments. This will be the end of these morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>under most international laws, the basic litmus test for these cases to proceed requires one key component; the defendant must have profited from his actions of providing the software.<br />
I&#8217;ve done the research on Pablo and as far as i can tell, his software seems to be freeware and nowhere does it mention that he was pocketing any money from his work. My guess is that the recording industry is slowly losing any credibility in the eyes of the law and is showing its signs of desperation. With time, nobody is going to listen or want to address any of their stupid arguments. This will be the end of these morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-15 00:15:16 -->
