<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MPAA &#8211; Camming Movies is an Acceptable Practice (for Teachers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86188/mpaa-camming-movies-is-an-acceptable-practice-for-teachers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86188/mpaa-camming-movies-is-an-acceptable-practice-for-teachers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: XBrav</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86188/mpaa-camming-movies-is-an-acceptable-practice-for-teachers/#comment-190078</link>
		<dc:creator>XBrav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 05:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86188#comment-190078</guid>
		<description>I watched this video, and couldn&#039;t follow what they were trying to imply.

However, a things to note:

1) They used VLC. What does this prove?
a) Chances are those clips were in an AVI container
b) By the way they played the files, they are NOT original footage. They are duplicated from a digital source.

2) There were no copyright disclaimers in any of these clips they show. Does this mean that the MPAA doesn&#039;t even credit the distributors?

3) Was that session supposed to be recorded? You&#039;d think the MPAA would even go as far as to copyright their presentations...

This organization just confuses me more each day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched this video, and couldn&#8217;t follow what they were trying to imply.</p>
<p>However, a things to note:</p>
<p>1) They used VLC. What does this prove?<br />
a) Chances are those clips were in an AVI container<br />
b) By the way they played the files, they are NOT original footage. They are duplicated from a digital source.</p>
<p>2) There were no copyright disclaimers in any of these clips they show. Does this mean that the MPAA doesn&#8217;t even credit the distributors?</p>
<p>3) Was that session supposed to be recorded? You&#8217;d think the MPAA would even go as far as to copyright their presentations&#8230;</p>
<p>This organization just confuses me more each day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-15 00:18:34 -->
