Apr 7 2009

MPAA SHOCKER: “PreVail” Cammer Gets Small Fine, No Jail Time

  • Written by soulxtc
  • 10 Comments


Gets off easy, had faced up to 90 years imprisonment and over $1 million USD in fines for copyright infringement.

The MPAA and the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) have suffered an unusually embarrassing blow with news that 26yo Craig Farrugia of Australia was freed after pleading guilty to 18 counts of copyright infringement, and even after having been found to be be “part of an organized criminal conspiracy” in the process.

Farrugia had been accused of supplying the PreVail “Scene” group with illegal camcordings of a number recently-released movies including: “He’s Just Not That Into You”, “Marley and Me”, “Yes Man”, “Bedtime Stories”, and “Beverley Hills Chihuahua.”

Each count could have meant up to 5 years and prison (90yrs total) and a $43,311 USD fine. Instead he was immediately released on an 18mo non-custodial “good behavior bond” and fined a mere $3,866 USD.

The charges arose from a 13 February raid by New South Wales Police, supported by investigators from the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), in which sophisticated video camcording and computer equipment was seized. Tests of the equipment apparently confirmed that it had been used for making the illegal CAMs cited before.

AFACT investigators and the MPAA have to be dejected by the sentencing because of all the work involvd and the fact that the conviction really won’t serve as the “powerful message to others” that it had hoped for.

Magistrate Keady, whom presided over the trial, had even declared that Farrugia’s actions were “..part of an organised criminal conspiracy” and even compared it to home burglary.

“[The movie industry is] ..entitled to the same protection of their property as are householders whose house is broken into and property removed,” he said. “It is a property offense similar to that of larceny.”

Too bad the “larceny” in this case hasn’t seemed to prevent the MPAA from being on pace to break the already record-breaking previous year’s ticket sales, both domestic and overseas.

The MPAA tried to play up the successful prosecution, but did lament the fact that Farrugia got off easy.

“While we are pleased with the very prompt closure of this matter, we are disappointed in the sentence meted out by the Court as it has failed to recognize the damage this particular crime can have on the industry,” said Mike Ellis, pres and manager of the MPAA’s Asia-Pacific region. “This illegal act of camcording can single-handedly destroy the ability of a movie to recoup the investment made in its production and adversely impact the business of cinemas, DVD retail outlets and on-line services around the world that rely on the downstream revenue of the movie. We hope for more stringent sentences to be passed in Australia to deter anyone thinking about camcording.”

This is the second Australian conviction for making illegal CAMs. In November 2007, Jose Duarte was convicted of camcording and distributing “The Simpsons Movie” on his mobile phone and uploading it to the Internet. The unauthorized recording was tracked to streaming sites and P2P systems within 72 hours of Duarte making and uploading it.

Related Posts

  1. MPAA Wants a UK CAM Piracy Crackdown
  2. MPAA blunders big time Down-Under
  3. Australian File Traders Avoid Jail
  4. DOH! 1st Pirated Copy of ‘The Simpsons’ Gets Traced to Australia
  5. DVD DECSS Case: Johansen vs. MPAA
Zeropaid on Facebook

Comments

  1. Hath

    Pirates prevail!!! (pun intended) :P

  2. 1cooldude

    I am all heart broken with this inequality of the courts having common sense. Wow, ain’t that a shame? Now, I am expecting an announcements of a major profit drop for the forthcoming fiscal year. I will not be able to sleep tonight!!

  3. mountain_rage

    The sentence actually seems incredibly fair and balanced for once. Strange considering he equated the theft as burglary. Losses are always hugely exaggerated in these situations, most people could care less about cam rips. If all sentences were this reasonable, I don’t think I would have much to argue against.

  4. ConfusedMime

    just because they make absurd sentencing to begin with doesn’t mean a $3,866 fine doesn’t suck balls but then again i never understood shitty cam rips in the first place

  5. JACKMACK

    WOULD NEVER WATCH A CAM RIP…THEY ARE TORTURE TO WATCH…

    TERRIBLE BATHROOM SOUND..AWFUL VIDEO.

    RUINS THE FILM.

  6. wart0rn

    I agree Jack! They should arrest them for bad quality! I don’t get it personally. I understand getting excited about a movie and wanting a copy, but if it’s so poor. Why bother?

  7. Dan

    good work mate glad you got off keep up the good work

  8. th madbean

    for those of you knocking cams obviously not seen some of prevails work then !!

  9. 1cooldude

    @th madbean

    absolutely and it’s getting better every day.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(4 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

  • Sophieanne and Lilli: I wish their was more music....
  • ralphie: OH looky, it still doesn't work on dual screens. Adobe sucks....
  • odball: hej jag är en leged user och nu kommer jag inte in på sidan kan ni vara snälla och undersöka varför mvh G.P...
  • mpsharp.com Blog » Watching NFL games online: [...] show you a number of streams to choose from for each game.  All the streams require some sort of StreamTorrent pl...
  • ejonesss: no it is not going to completely stop piracy because while it will stop those whose reason for piracy is quality it is n...
  • file sharing anonymously - P2Pfreak.com: [...] and Trusty Files) just google any one of them and you will get some great info. also here IP filtering with uTorr...
  • soulxtc: Wasn't aware people were guaranteed jobs...
  • mountain_rage: BTW Youtube is supposed to go 1080P soon :D....
  • sdsd