It was file-sharing that helped them distribute their music to listeners for free but, now it seems that profits are their biggest concern.
The first real breakthrough act of the download era, the band that used MySpace and file-sharing to build their audience, has now apparently secretly employed Web Sheriff to make sure that their new album, “Favourite Worst Nightmare,” stays off P2P and file-sharing networks.
It’s being reported that V2, the band’s record label, has hired Web Sheriff, the London based P2P and file-sharing network copyright monitor, to protect against the Arctic Monkey’s latest album from spreading across the internet.
John Giacobbi, the managing director Web Sheriff said that “They were looking at up to one million illegal MP3 song files spreading of an album which was supposed to break the band internationally.”
Now to be fair, it’s not entirely clear that the Arctic Monkeys were involved in the decision to hire a company to remove it from file-sharing networks but, considering that file-sharing is in large part responsible for their success in the first place, it definitely seems ironic that somebody is trying to kill off that which made them what they are today.
Alex Turner, the band’s guitarist, noted a few years back that file-sharing is what catapulted the band to fame, that the press, radio and television were almost circumvented entirely in the group’s audience-building process.
“We’d record these three-song demo EPs and give them out at shows. Soon people began posting the tracks on websites, and the songs quickly spread to various bulletin boards and Internet forums. It was definitely those people posting and swapping our songs online who were responsible for the early groundswell of attention,” Turner acknowledged.
“As technology keeps moving on, there’ve been some real changes in the way people are finding out about new bands and hearing music.”
So why the sudden change? Well, now that they’ve “gone legit,” so to speak, and are signed with a recording label, it’s a natural progression that somebody’s going to want to protect their profits and their investment..
But, is it really a good thing? Do they risk turning off their audience if they suddenly seems as corporate and regulated as all the others? Maybe, maybe not but, I guarantee you that if people start receiving notices for posting the band’s content illegally that they risk losing the core audience that’s responsible for them getting a record deal in the first place.
It seems like a biting the hand the feeds you sort of decision on their part but, like I said, perhaps, and hopefully so, it’s their label that’s to blame for the decision and not theirs. Yet, I can’t help but wonder if ignorance is a good enough excuse to be free from blame.
In any event, I’d like to hear what the Arctic Monkey’s current position on file-sharing is, and what they think about their label’s decision to go after those that post their new album online.
digg_url = ‘http://digg.com/music/Arctic_Monkeys_turn_their_backs_on_P2P’;
RELATED NEWS AND “HOW TO” GUIDES:
3 Quick Ways to Watch Movies for FREE!
3 quick ways to watch TV shows for FREE
BitTorrent tracker sites & search engines
Azureus – A Beginner’s Guide to BitTorrent Downloading
Watch The Simpsons, The Office, Jackass, South Park, Lost, X-Men, and More On-Demand For Free
SOULXTC: “walkin’ the streets of P2P”
Related Posts
- Music industry searching for alternative revenue
- Marketers Try to Turn Web Pirates Into Customers
- Wes Borland on P2P
- Slipknot Frontman: ‘Record Labels to Blame for Illegal Downloading’
- Rap Star ‘Flo Rida’ Says File-Sharing is ‘Allrighta’
Loading ...
Just a bunch of idiots that forgot where they came from.But remember the internet made them…it can BREAK them as well!
I’m guessing that it may be the executives making the decision rather then the artist. The reason I think this is that artist usually don’t make all that much money off their albums their profits are in concerts and merchandise so they would still be making allot of money from those sources. Chances are the executives who profit greatly from record sales made the decision to make the money. Thats not to say they are not responsible if they did not make the decision they should be standing up for their fans and that is inexcusable.
@Mountain RAge
Exactly. AT what point does an artist have the responsibility to say “Hey that aint cool?” Just because its not necessarily your choice doesnt mean u get a free pass to be quiet and say nothing ESPECIALLY IF ITS HOW YOU MADE IT IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!
EVery other artist has their shit on P2P and they seem to be doing just fine Have yet to see pics of Christina Aguilera standing in a soup line.
When it comes down to it its the fact that P2P made them what they are and now their handlers are putting the smack down on it. Just bad for their image if anything but I guess their too big of rick stars to care. I wonder if one of them will now be the new Lars Ulrich.
I hope the new album sucks and they have to beg people to toss it up on BitTorrent.
Wow…y’all seem pretty grumpy about the prospect of PAYING for music. And don’t get me wrong, I’m all about free music. But why do you guys need to attack the Monkeys so acrimoniously? This is these guys’ living. They want to survive from the proceeds of their music so that they can keep doing it all day everyday to bring great shows and recordings to the audience. Why shouldn’t they eat? Crimony.