<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia&#8217;s Image Is Tarnished as an Editor Is Exposed as Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8484/wikipedias_image_is_tarnished_as_an_editor_is_exposed_as_fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8484/wikipedias_image_is_tarnished_as_an_editor_is_exposed_as_fraud/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: StormNinja</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8484/wikipedias_image_is_tarnished_as_an_editor_is_exposed_as_fraud/#comment-183652</link>
		<dc:creator>StormNinja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183652</guid>
		<description>The fact that he has no degrees doesn&#039;t negate the work that he did in compling parts of the encyclopedia. If the information he contriubuted was factual and independantly verifiable then the work speaks for itself.

If people did not put so much emphasis on having a piece of paper to establish  being capable of certain endeavors this would not be an issue.  Example:  Dr Lara S. has a Ph.D in physiology yet gives advice on inter-personal relationships.  The point being just because she understands bio-mechanics does not qualify her to tell a person how to deal with psychological and social problems.  Yet she piggy backs the ti&lt;x&gt;tle &quot;doctor&quot; onto her vocation of giving her opinions as professional theraputic advice.

 I am not saying I agree with how he handled the situation.  I am saying I understand why he did what he did and that the greater issue of attempting invalidate perfectly good work for an outdated social convention in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that he has no degrees doesn&#8217;t negate the work that he did in compling parts of the encyclopedia. If the information he contriubuted was factual and independantly verifiable then the work speaks for itself.</p>
<p>If people did not put so much emphasis on having a piece of paper to establish  being capable of certain endeavors this would not be an issue.  Example:  Dr Lara S. has a Ph.D in physiology yet gives advice on inter-personal relationships.  The point being just because she understands bio-mechanics does not qualify her to tell a person how to deal with psychological and social problems.  Yet she piggy backs the ti<x>tle &#8220;doctor&#8221; onto her vocation of giving her opinions as professional theraputic advice.</p>
<p> I am not saying I agree with how he handled the situation.  I am saying I understand why he did what he did and that the greater issue of attempting invalidate perfectly good work for an outdated social convention in my opinion.</x></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-15 00:32:03 -->
