A 16-year-old boy being sued by five record companies accusing him of online music piracy accused the recording industry on Tuesday of violating antitrust laws, conspiring to defraud the courts and making extortionate threats.
In papers responding to the record companies’ lawsuit, Robert Santangelo, who was as young as 11 when the alleged piracy occurred, denied ever disseminating music and said it’s impossible to prove that he did.
Santangelo is the son of Patti Santangelo, the 42-year-old suburban mother of five who was sued by the record companies in 2005. She refused to settle, took her case public and became a heroine to supporters of Internet freedom.
The industry dropped its case against her in December but sued Robert and his sister Michelle, now 20, in federal court in White Plains. Michelle has been ordered to pay $30,750 in a default judgment because she did not respond to the lawsuit.
Related
- Taking On Record Companies
- Napster Gets 10 Months to Prove Record Industry Collusion
- RIAA goes after more kids
- Record companies ready suit against Yahoo China
- Record Companies Hold Stake in YouTube
This case will be very interesting. If it turns out that Stangelo wins the case it could compleatly derail all efforts by the riaa to persue individuals in court. Also if it is proven they were using the courts to pressure people into paying sums of money it could come back and force the record companies to pay all the money back.