Individuals who use the Internet to distribute information from another source may not be held to account if the material is considered defamatory, the California Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a reversal of a lower court decision.
The ruling supports federal law that clears individuals of liability if they transmit, but are not the source of, defamatory information. It expands protections the law gives to Internet service providers to include bloggers and activist Web sites.
"We acknowledge that recognizing broad immunity for defamatory republication on the Internet has some troubling consequences," California’s high court justices said in their opinion.
"Until Congress chooses to revise the settled law in this area, however, plaintiffs who contend they were defamed in an Internet posting may only seek recovery from the original source of the statement," the decision stated.
Related Posts
- US Senate Keeps Telecom Immunity Provision
- US State of the Union Address – Give Telecoms Immunity
- California Court Says Posting DVD Code Not Free Speech
- Swedish Appeal(s) court clears man of file sharing
- German District Court Orders Rapidshare to Block Copyrighted Content

