<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft tackles anti-copy hole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7399/microsoft_tackles_anticopy_hole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7399/microsoft_tackles_anticopy_hole/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:25:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: axlman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7399/microsoft_tackles_anticopy_hole/#comment-184901</link>
		<dc:creator>axlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-184901</guid>
		<description>deploy an updated fix for who? The Reseller or the customer? If it&#039;s for the customer then who in their right mind would install the update/fix?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deploy an updated fix for who? The Reseller or the customer? If it&#8217;s for the customer then who in their right mind would install the update/fix?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobhss</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7399/microsoft_tackles_anticopy_hole/#comment-184902</link>
		<dc:creator>bobhss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-184902</guid>
		<description>they&#039;ll push it to everyone as a &quot;critical&quot; update to Windows like Genuine Notifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;ll push it to everyone as a &#8220;critical&#8221; update to Windows like Genuine Notifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signa</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7399/microsoft_tackles_anticopy_hole/#comment-184903</link>
		<dc:creator>Signa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-184903</guid>
		<description>i assume this is for vista?  why the hell didnt they wait for it to be released before they start doing stuff like this.  MS is going to fix &quot;bugs&quot; like this while its  still in development</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i assume this is for vista?  why the hell didnt they wait for it to be released before they start doing stuff like this.  MS is going to fix &#8220;bugs&#8221; like this while its  still in development</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdking</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7399/microsoft_tackles_anticopy_hole/#comment-184904</link>
		<dc:creator>gdking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-184904</guid>
		<description>lol reminds me of the funniest message present in windows update chich went along the lines of:

&#039;windows genuine advantage tool will identify if your copy of windows is genuine and help you obtain a genuine one of not&#039;

lol!


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol reminds me of the funniest message present in windows update chich went along the lines of:</p>
<p>&#8216;windows genuine advantage tool will identify if your copy of windows is genuine and help you obtain a genuine one of not&#8217;</p>
<p>lol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inoesomestuff</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7399/microsoft_tackles_anticopy_hole/#comment-184905</link>
		<dc:creator>inoesomestuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-184905</guid>
		<description>vista is going to be loaded up the a$$ w/copy protection. they are prob goign to push a more secure encryption then &quot;require&quot; users for thoes websites to use the new encryption to continue their service (download and install more m$ software)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vista is going to be loaded up the a$$ w/copy protection. they are prob goign to push a more secure encryption then &#8220;require&#8221; users for thoes websites to use the new encryption to continue their service (download and install more m$ software)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axion22</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7399/microsoft_tackles_anticopy_hole/#comment-184906</link>
		<dc:creator>Axion22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-184906</guid>
		<description>Aha!
First it was &quot;Oh man we&#039;d better make DRM to protect our hojillions in intellectual properties!&quot;

Now it&#039;s &quot;Aww shit they hack our DRM. Why didn&#039;t we just leave them alone in the first place?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha!<br />
First it was &#8220;Oh man we&#8217;d better make DRM to protect our hojillions in intellectual properties!&#8221;</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s &#8220;Aww shit they hack our DRM. Why didn&#8217;t we just leave them alone in the first place?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
