<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woman forces US record industry to drop file-sharing case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7151/woman_forces_us_record_industry_to_drop_filesharing_case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7151/woman_forces_us_record_industry_to_drop_filesharing_case/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:01:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PM Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7151/woman_forces_us_record_industry_to_drop_filesharing_case/#comment-185166</link>
		<dc:creator>PM Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-185166</guid>
		<description>Good job Tammie! Innocent until proven guilty. Besides SHARING is SHARING. Prove we didn&#039;t buy it. Prove we stole it. Prove we knew it was copywrited material........Virgin Sony and the others can kiss our harddrives!

PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Tammie! Innocent until proven guilty. Besides SHARING is SHARING. Prove we didn&#8217;t buy it. Prove we stole it. Prove we knew it was copywrited material&#8230;&#8230;..Virgin Sony and the others can kiss our harddrives!</p>
<p>PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpocksBrainOnDrugs</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7151/woman_forces_us_record_industry_to_drop_filesharing_case/#comment-185167</link>
		<dc:creator>SpocksBrainOnDrugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-185167</guid>
		<description>Could the empire be crumbling a bit today? Sure hope so... RIAA bastards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the empire be crumbling a bit today? Sure hope so&#8230; RIAA bastards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoreVexed</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7151/woman_forces_us_record_industry_to_drop_filesharing_case/#comment-185168</link>
		<dc:creator>SoreVexed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-185168</guid>
		<description>Eventually there will be laws in effect that will make this case a thing of the past. I am not cursing the P2P world its just the way the USA works and as long as we control the UN it will happen everywhere. Except finland and a handful of other counties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eventually there will be laws in effect that will make this case a thing of the past. I am not cursing the P2P world its just the way the USA works and as long as we control the UN it will happen everywhere. Except finland and a handful of other counties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unsueable Davey Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7151/woman_forces_us_record_industry_to_drop_filesharing_case/#comment-185169</link>
		<dc:creator>Unsueable Davey Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-185169</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking about all the old threads on ZP and elsewhere discussing whether or not filesharing was illegal. Every once in a while some brave soul would say &quot;not really. It&#039;s not really illegal until it&#039;s been proven in court.&quot; That bold soldier would be ignored or jumped on.

I&#039;m also thinking of all the poor saps who listened to the rhetoric and forked out 3500 bucks a crack in extortion money to the RIAA as settlement fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking about all the old threads on ZP and elsewhere discussing whether or not filesharing was illegal. Every once in a while some brave soul would say &#8220;not really. It&#8217;s not really illegal until it&#8217;s been proven in court.&#8221; That bold soldier would be ignored or jumped on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also thinking of all the poor saps who listened to the rhetoric and forked out 3500 bucks a crack in extortion money to the RIAA as settlement fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burd</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/7151/woman_forces_us_record_industry_to_drop_filesharing_case/#comment-185170</link>
		<dc:creator>Burd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-185170</guid>
		<description>This is not a precedent since it was not the decision of the judge. The recording companies dropped it BECAUSE they didn&#039;t want a precedent. SoreVexed is right. Now they will work with the legislators whom they have in their back pockets to come up with a law to correct this loophole. This is another case of technology getting ahead of the law. Now there will be a rush to catch up. Wireless networks are indeed a conundrum. If a city provides wireless service--as many are now doing--and someone uses that service to share copyrighted files who is liable? The city? I think not. It will be interesting to see what kind of restrictive laws they will come up with. We have to keep a close eye on those legistlators who file such bills. They hear a lot from the recording industry but now they need to hear from us--the public the voters--loud and clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a precedent since it was not the decision of the judge. The recording companies dropped it BECAUSE they didn&#8217;t want a precedent. SoreVexed is right. Now they will work with the legislators whom they have in their back pockets to come up with a law to correct this loophole. This is another case of technology getting ahead of the law. Now there will be a rush to catch up. Wireless networks are indeed a conundrum. If a city provides wireless service&#8211;as many are now doing&#8211;and someone uses that service to share copyrighted files who is liable? The city? I think not. It will be interesting to see what kind of restrictive laws they will come up with. We have to keep a close eye on those legistlators who file such bills. They hear a lot from the recording industry but now they need to hear from us&#8211;the public the voters&#8211;loud and clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
