Judge Trager in Brooklyn federal court has followed the decisions of the district courts in Arizona and Texas, and denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, in Maverick v. Goldshteyn.
Quoted from judgement:
Plaintiffs have pled a claim of copyright infringement which meets the standards established by Rule 8. The complaint sets forth the acts allegedly constituting copyright infringement with sufficient specificity to put Goldshteyn on notice of the grounds for their claim. The allegations, pled on information and belief, are also sufficient to state a claim of copyright infringement without supplemental facts indicating the source of plaintiffs’ belief. For these reasons, plaintiffs have stated a claim for which relief may be granted, and Goldshteyn’s motion to dismiss is denied.
July 31, 2006, Decision of Judge David G. Trager
Related Posts
- Another Motion to Dismiss Complaint Denied in Texas…Court has “Incomplete Knowledge of Technology”
- TorrentSpy Files Motion to Dismiss
- New motion in RIAA p2p lawsuits
- RIAA Says It Doesn’t Have Enough Evidence
- ReplayTV case: judge allows user testimony
Loading ...
