Yet another motion to dismiss a complaint has been denied in Texas, again with the judge saying that he has “incomplete understanding of the P2P technology at this stage” to decide whether or not “the mere presence of copyrighted sound recordings in Defendant’s share file constitutes infringement.”
This was in Fonovisa v. Alvarez in Abilene, Texas.
Decision and order denying motion to dismiss complaint*
Once again the judge has ruled that the defendant must go through the expense of pretrial discovery before he can have a sufficient “understanding” to decide the issues.
Related Posts
- Brooklyn Judge Follows Arizona and Texas Cases; Denies Motion to Dismiss in Maverick v. Goldshteyn
- TorrentSpy Files Motion to Dismiss
- Court says neutral party must examine hard drive in file-sharing case
- New motion in RIAA p2p lawsuits
- Court Helps Record Labels Define KaZaA’s ‘Shared Folder’ in Lawsuit
Zeropaid on Facebook

