Get the NEW Torrent Search NOW!!



Has Pirate Bay Sold Out the BitTorrent Community?

posted by soulxtc in bittorrent // 823 days 18 hours 23 minutes ago
I was handed an interesting link this afternoon detaining a correspondence of sorts between BitTorrent search engine Meganova and those "ad slingers" over at Targetpoint.


It appears as though a year back the guys (and gals?) over at Meganova were contacted by reps from Targetpoint wishing to purchase the site for a paltry $20,000USD. In response they not only only refused, but also discontinued any further association with them, including a hurried removal of all their ads from the site.


The blog goes on to detail some eyebrow-raising business relationships that exist between Targetpoint and several other popular torrent search engines.


The first is Empornium, which as you may have heard was the recent victim of a "hostile takeover." The site initially took on Targetpoint as an investor to "to use their resources to make the site better with better servers, a complete rebuild and a potentially wider audience." But, unfortunately what happened is that a proverbial deal with the devil was made and Targetpoint slowly took over complete control of the site and eventually locked out the site's admins. To further the blow's sting, it was quickly converted to a pay site. Is it just me or is BitTorrent and paysite an oxymoron? When one stops to consider that is by and large copyrighted material being distributed without proper authorization, how can one have the gall to charge you for it? It reminds me of that sketchy situation over at AllofMP3.com, whereby you can buy a whole album "legally" for like a buck and a half.


The second, and the most painful to read about concerns The Pirate Bay, which was recently crowned home of true-blue swash-buckling pirates for having apparently fought off Swedish and United States "G-men" after a midnight server raid. They sailed back into port from self-imposed exile and were cheered and hailed as heroes the world over. Yet, all the while they were quietly raking in millions of dollars from Pirate Bay schwag sales and now, as it comes to light, from obscenely huge Targetpoint ad sales as well.


Not only is the site operating with revenues that far exceed it's operating costs, which is fine, I'm no communist, but when you have ads that can cost in upwards of 20,000 euros ($25,580USD) for a single day, it makes you stop and wonder. Cofounders Fredrik Neij and Gottfrid Svartholm want people to think it's some sort of "blue-collar site," that it's more of a hobby than it is a full-fledged corporation. Yet, with revenue rising astronomically, especially after the recent media attention, it makes you really want to question your support for such a site.


To reveal a bit more of the financial undertakings of the Pirate Bay and its efforts to stash its "booty," read the except below from Rixstep:

Eastpoint sell ads for The Pirate Bay in the Scandinavian market. File sharing is most widespread in Sweden where many people have broadband. But The Pirate Bay runs in twenty five different languages and gets visitors from all corners of the planet.

In other countries other ads are shown. The total revenues are therefore much more than what Eastpoint arrange.

Eastpoint keep a bit of the revenues and then put the rest in an account with Random Media who in turn pay the money to the owners of The Pirate Bay. Random Media have a telephone number in Stockholm but an address in Geneva Switzerland. At the same address can be found Geneva Management Group (GMG). This latter company specialise in tax planning and estate management. They help corporations and private individuals move money to low tax countries with strict bank confidentiality where authorities can't control them.

GMG refuse to reveal their relationship with Random Media but they do offer a telephone number to Random Media's representative Daniel Oded. Oded works for Target Point in Tel Aviv Israel. In 1999 Oded received an international patent for a technical system for selling ads on the Internet.

When SvD rang Daniel Oded he refused to reveal what Random Media are and why the company have an address in Switzerland but a telephone number in Stockholm. And he refused to reveal where the ad revenues for The Pirate Bay disappear to.


Now I don't know about you, but it really makes you wonder what kind of support your giving the Pirate Bay each time you visit them. I mean it's one thing when you visit a place like OINK for instance, and the cash generated goes to things like maintenance, upkeep, and yah even a few bills or two in the pocket for sweat and tears. But, when it becomes to such a degree that you have offshore tax havens involved and shady ad companies like Targetpoint skulking about it gives one pause for reflection.


Meganova has made some interesting suggestions as to what one should do if you feel as they, and now I too, about the matter. They write:

"Here’s what I suggest and would like your opinions on this one. Stop using these sites, not just because we have personal beef with them, but because the torrent scene is getting fucked up a bit more every day, there are tons of better sites then these: Torrentz.com , isohunt.com , filelist.org , fileporn.org , Torrentspy.com , fulldls.com , bitenova.nl etc.. Don’t be blinded by the public opinion about mininova and the piratebay because everything they claim to be is everything they are not. All they care about is money money money and more money."


Okay so might be a little jaded from the whole experience, but there is truth in what they have to say. I think the future looks pretty grim for the BitTorrent community if we continue to patronize PAYING torrent sites, or even those whose revenues are seemingly out of touch with the reality of their services. I know a guy has to make too, but do you think it really makes the BT community look good if guys are making huge profits off of stuff that isn't even theirs? It's one thing to facilitate a place where people can trade stuff and enjoy it irregardless of the legality, as I think it speaks more towards the importance of the free flow of media nd information. It's entirely different creature when people are profiteering on the exchange of that very same media nd information when they had no hand in creating that content in the first place. Moreover, it risks the health of the BT community in its entirety as it allows it's opponents a perfect example to which they can argue the case that pirates are indeed "pirates," that they make money hand over fist at the expense of others.


So I suggest we do as the guys over at Meganova suggested and visit sites other than Pirate Bay, Mininova, and the like where profits are totally out of line with operating costs. Or better yet, is there any way can we get some of this cash in the pockets of Bram Cohen? He's the guy who made all this possible without much money to show for it. I think we all owe him a debt of gratitude, more so than Pirate Bay anyhow.


UPDATE:


I came across some more figures in regards to Pirate Bay's financial picture from Bemmu's Blog. He writes:

After several Swedish magazines attempted to calculate advertising revenues for Pirate Bay, Svenska Dagbladet said that the advertising revenues for the past four months reached 600000 SEK (84000 USD or 65400 EUR). This information was provided to the magazine from the advertising company Eastpoint Media.

Svenska Dagbladet reminds that in reality even larger sums are involved. Pirate Bay operates internationally and advertising sales are therefore also international and being sold by more companies than only Eastpoint Media. In addition it was recently written in Dagens Nyheter that going prices for advertisements on Pirate Bay have recently been on the rise.



Digg This Story

Recent News
Copyright Industry Getting Slaughtered in the Stock Markets
ACDC's 'Black Ice' Leaked to BitTorrent
Scratch: The Ultimate DJ a Rip Off of Beatmania?
Chamber of Commerce: 'Interference With Copyright Laws = Marxism'
Judge Upholds Temp Ban on RealNetworks DVD-Copying Program
Nokia Thinks a DRM Based Online Music Business Model Will Work
New Zealand Braces for Amended Copyright Law to Take Effect


  • #1    I dont fault them for making money, but making money while representing different "political" motives is just tricking people.. I don't expect this to hurt their cashflow at all, but will make them a larger target for the RIAA/MPAA and competitors
    posted by dubstylee 823 days 16 hours 5 minutes ago
  • #2    I do fault them for making money. $84000 in USD, in 4 months? There isn't enough money to go around! Anyone who makes that much money and doesn't give it away is in some way causing someone in the world to starve to death. I'm all for rewarding people for a job well done, but that much money is too much! Just because the RIAA pulls in a million dollars a month or whatever, doesn't mean that it's a good thing the Pirate Bay is sucking that much money out of the economy. A squirrelfox can't even pay rent, and they pull in $84,000. Are they 84,000 times more worthy to live than me? Do you [u]really[/u] think so?
    posted by teto 822 days 21 hours 18 minutes ago
  • #3    Yes Teto I think they *ARE* worht 84000 times as mucha s you! They actually provide a sevice for the money not just a bunch of whining.
    posted by pearl298 822 days 3 hours 7 minutes ago
  • #4    Wow teto, I've never heard such socialist bullshit before. You must live in one of those liberal european countries where it's a sin to have money and the goverment supports everybody.
    posted by Soonerpet 822 days 2 hours 55 minutes ago
  • #5    teto is right in the fact they should share it. bram cohen does deserve some money for what he has done for us. making that much money from piracy is just as bad as selling bootlegs for a profit. they only difference is they really arent breaking any laws while doing it.
    posted by Signa 821 days 6 hours 21 minutes ago
  • #6    I don't agree with Teto or Signa.

    If I create a business (selling software or running a site) and it starts making 1,000,000 a month..I deserve that money (as long as I am not scewing anyone out of money or committing any crime).

    The guys over at thepiratebay are providing a great service. I have been able to find almost any bittorent file there. Also, they have to pay for bandwidth..are you willing to split the cost of the bandwidth with them as well? (I would imagine it is > $10,000 per month)...I didn't think so.

    Bram Cohen created bittorrent..but he DOES NOT DESEVE ANY MONEY FROM THEPIRATEBAY. That's as rediculous as saying that Microsoft Deserves Money from a company that makes money using a word document or excel spreadsheet. Bram just happened to be the one that didn't get completly destroyed after the RIAA went after all of the programmers of various P2P apps. I have been coming to zeropaid since the opennap days (anyone remember opennap)? How about audiognome...or Filenavigator? All Programs that pre-dates Bittorrent by at least 4 years and had better technology and or functionality.
    posted by jlabs 819 days 15 hours 53 minutes ago
  • #7    Laws are laws and I follow some of them if I agree with them, if not I follow them only when I have too.

    Pirate Bay has done an excellent job creating a successful business model and I particularly like their shifty money handling and Tax avoidance. Why pay more taxes when you don't have too. Keep in mind they really are Pirates its not just name. I only wish two things. #1 I wish I lived in Sweden and thought this. #2 Use some of the money to improve the shitty search function and page lag time.
    posted by DwarfBaby 815 days 16 hours 42 minutes ago
  • #8    the problem with the MS/word analogy is that MS charges a shitton for word and bram made BT free and open source. the idea when you buy office is that its a business investement and that is why they charge you so much. because you will be making money off of the program. the problem wtih PB is that they are equating themselves with real pirates because they are making money off of filesharing. would any of you say it was ok for them to offer burnt CDs of stuff for a substantal profit, even if that profit is 1/8 what they are making now? my point is, they are making more than just a living off of filesharing. but because they arent actullally burning the disks, they arent crossing any of your lines. that is why i think they need to share it, not with me, not with the industry or necessarly bram cohen. but they damn well had better help out the file sharers that get sued for doing less than they are.
    posted by Signa 815 days 2 hours 23 minutes ago
  • #9    Use an ad blocker.

    simple.

    I personally use Ad Muncher and I don't see a single ad on any site

    I've added a couple of exclude entries so I can choose which sites I support.

    zeropaid.com is one of them.

    http://www.admuncher.com/beta.pl

    This is the proverbial "no brainer" ;)
    posted by AdsLander 812 days 11 hours 7 minutes ago
  • #10    Why exactly should the Pirate Bay guys be giving their money to other torrent sites that are getting sued? They’re obviously capitalists and they’re doing what good capitalists do. They’re making money because they’re smarter than everyone else out there and I don’t see why they should give that money back or refuse to sells ads. A better search function would be nice though.
    posted by bob324 155 days 19 hours 47 minutes ago

Login to ZeroPaid.com
Username
Password

* Be sure that you have cookies enabled in your browser, without them you will not be able to login correctly.

Register here if you are not a member of Zeropaid.com.

members that voted for this story
© 2000 - 2008 Zeropaid Inc, All rights reserved.
Company Info | Contact Us | Zeropaid Crew | Advertise | Cheap Cars
Hosting Provided by:
San Diego Colocation - Complex Drive