<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court say removing sex, profanity from films violates copyright laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/6822/court_say_removing_sex_profanity_from_films_violates_copyright_laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/6822/court_say_removing_sex_profanity_from_films_violates_copyright_laws/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: zaphodiv</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/6822/court_say_removing_sex_profanity_from_films_violates_copyright_laws/#comment-185425</link>
		<dc:creator>zaphodiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-185425</guid>
		<description>I suspect these guys just didn&#039;t offer the studios enough money.

I don&#039;t like this prescedent because it can also be applied to removing adverts. The scumbag lawyers arguments goes that if I buy a box that skips or blanks adverts I&#039;m making a derivative work from copyrighted material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect these guys just didn&#8217;t offer the studios enough money.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like this prescedent because it can also be applied to removing adverts. The scumbag lawyers arguments goes that if I buy a box that skips or blanks adverts I&#8217;m making a derivative work from copyrighted material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swamphox</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/6822/court_say_removing_sex_profanity_from_films_violates_copyright_laws/#comment-185426</link>
		<dc:creator>swamphox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-185426</guid>
		<description>I dont beleive the precedent would be set for that zaph

commercials are different entities containing their own copyrights (put a copyrighted ad in your portfolio and try and get a job at the same ad agency that owns the copyright:)  it will be interesting and educational)

so if tv shows were to do that they would have to sell ads wayyyy ahead of time in order to integrate it into the show...since ads are ba&lt;x&gt;sed on a set price ba&lt;x&gt;sed on the projected number of people who see them it would be very difficult for a tv show to pitch an ad space to a client and make it part of their show without proven data

therefor new shows would have a more difficult time finding advertisers and since the TV and cable networks want to make it as easy as possible for people to do business with them I doubt they would use this as a precedent...theres too much work involved and too many changes that need to be ade on the content providers end of things

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont beleive the precedent would be set for that zaph</p>
<p>commercials are different entities containing their own copyrights (put a copyrighted ad in your portfolio and try and get a job at the same ad agency that owns the copyright:)  it will be interesting and educational)</p>
<p>so if tv shows were to do that they would have to sell ads wayyyy ahead of time in order to integrate it into the show&#8230;since ads are ba<x>sed on a set price ba</x><x>sed on the projected number of people who see them it would be very difficult for a tv show to pitch an ad space to a client and make it part of their show without proven data</p>
<p>therefor new shows would have a more difficult time finding advertisers and since the TV and cable networks want to make it as easy as possible for people to do business with them I doubt they would use this as a precedent&#8230;theres too much work involved and too many changes that need to be ade on the content providers end of things</x></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooah</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/6822/court_say_removing_sex_profanity_from_films_violates_copyright_laws/#comment-185427</link>
		<dc:creator>Hooah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-185427</guid>
		<description>It will not be applied to removing advertisments. Because they are for your personal viewning. If you remove the advertisments then resale/rent them out it does apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will not be applied to removing advertisments. Because they are for your personal viewning. If you remove the advertisments then resale/rent them out it does apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-14 22:32:31 -->
