A TEST case comes before the law lords, Britain’s highest court, today that will determine how far newspapers and other internet publishers are open to lawsuits from people alleging that they have been libelled in any part of the world.
In a landmark ruling last year, the Court of Appeal ruled that internet publishers could not be sued in the English courts unless there had been a “substantial” publication in England. The ruling came in an action brought by Yousef Jameel, a Saudi Arabian who sought to sue the United States-based Dow Jones, the publisher of The Wall Street Journal, in London.
The Court of Appeal threw out the libel action against the online publication, saying that only five people in England had read the allegedly defamatory item, but Mr Jameel is appealing in a case that could lead to new guidelines on when publishers can rely on the so-called Reynolds defence, a defence of “public interest” or qualified privilege.
Related
- 2600 magazine will not appeal DeCSS link ruling
- EU poised to rule against Microsoft
- Madster to take case to the supreme court
- Symantec ask court to rule Hotbar.com as adware
- Victory Against Internet Censorship
