Comments on: More RIAA terror tactics

By: mountain_rage

mountain_rage — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000

Arnt dj remixes legal since they significantly alter the original music???

By: axlman

axlman — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000

I doubt it! Even the beat itself is copyrighted!

By: bobhss

bobhss — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000

If you make sound the RIAA wants money from it. Otherwise you are stealing the sound.

By: zachary1

zachary1 — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000

I am going to RIP A HUGE MASSIVE FART.

The check’s in the mail Glickman! )

By: Xidane

Xidane — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000

“Mixes aren’t bootlegs at all – they’re advertisements”.

I couldn’t agree more hell a Kelly Clarkston’s “Since you’ve been gone” remix is the first track on cd1 on the ministry of sound’s U.S. version of The Annual 2006 a typical move most likely on the riaa’s part for a pretty advertisement.

As for mr. Buckles he really doesn’t know jack for bootlegs mixes dubs or edits. For him a “remix” is what you would see on the back of a Lindsey Lohan cd as a “bonus track” at the end of the album. The guy needs to take a trip to the electronic section of a tower records of listen to a few thousand tiestos van buurens and pvds before pointing a finger at bootlegs and mixes yelling “PIRACY!” just my thoughts on it.