Apr 27 2006

Democrats lose House vote on Net neutrality

  • Written by dubstylee
  • 8 Comments

A hotly contested Democratic bid to enshrine extensive Net neutrality regulations in the law books failed Wednesday in the U.S. House of Representatives.

By a 34-22 vote, members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee rejected a Democratic-backed Net neutrality amendment that also enjoyed support from Internet and software companies including Microsoft, Amazon.com and Google.

Related Posts

  1. Senate deals blow to Net neutrality
  2. Net neutrality divides bureaucrats, too
  3. Senator offers Net neutrality compromise
  4. Democrats push ‘Net neutrality
  5. Microsoft balks on Net neutrality explainer
Zeropaid on Facebook

Comments

  1. mcovey

    what is net neutrality?

  2. icebox

    net neutrality means that ISPs can’t prefer traffic from one site over another ie they can’t make a deal with say ESPN to make their site load fast and disadvantage other sports sites to drive people away from those sites and to ESPN.

  3. mcovey

    I suppose that it is the spirit of our free market to allow ISPs to do as they please.

    And the most capitalistic thing us customers can do is to say “SCREW YOU” to all ISPs that do that.

  4. inoesomestuff

    hmm ISPs seem to have a hellava lot of power

  5. xoring

    It won’t end up being the ISPs so much as the back-bones who will really be making the mone. AOL-Time Warner one of the companies that wants to do this controls a major internet backbone in the US. If you have a fast enough internet connection you’ll notice that some backbones like Level3.net already put a cap on traffic crossing their lines. Any time I connect to server through the Level3.net backbone my speed drops to about 700KB/s. I’ve done traceroutes to different servers and as soon as the connection hits the Level3.net backbone the ping increases by 30-60ms.

  6. statusquo80

    This is very scary because we are talking about the flow of infomation on the internet. I dont even want to think where this will lead to if this really happens.

  7. zpman

    A bit paranoid aren’t we? Every company has deals with other companies. It’s how we all make money from one another. Be happy that you live in a society where information is available unlike the commies in China.

    By the way since we do live in a capitalist society NOT in a marxist society–the scariest thing is telling companies how they must run them.

  8. Leung Kwok-hung

    Infrastructure like this should be nationalised so that customers don’t get fucked over.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • ejonesss: no it is not going to completely stop piracy because while it will stop those whose reason for piracy is quality it is n...
  • soulxtc: Wasn't aware people were guaranteed jobs...
  • mountain_rage: BTW Youtube is supposed to go 1080P soon :D....
  • Gibbbo: Unfortunately the European stores still don't have anything close to the selection available in the USA store. I'm buyin...
  • STUDY: Artists Earn More in a P2P World: [...] personal favorite is the “The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P File-Sharing on the Purchase of Music: A Study F...
  • D.AN: So a stupid plan has been become a doubly-retarded plan....
  • UK POLL: File-Sharers Buy More Music: [...] most recent was “Consumer Culture in Times of Crisis,” conducted by the the BI Norwegian School of Management,...
  • Jiji: Charlie, which competitor torrent site are you a fan of exactly? Or is it a copyright enforcement agency? And if they've...
  • sdsd