The U.S. Congress appears reluctant to step into the long-simmering debate over file-swapping that received new fuel from a landmark court ruling on Monday.
Key politicians from both major political parties said they were inclined to let the lawsuit, MGM v. Grokster, proceed through the court system before deciding whether to alter copyright law. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court handed the case back to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for a full trial.
Patrick Leahy, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said through a spokeswoman that he “is going to let the courts continue their role in reviewing the next phase of this case.”
Sen. Orrin Hatch, the Utah Republican who heads an intellectual property subcommittee, said: “Prudence and respect for the role of the courts suggest Congress wait until it becomes clear how today’s decision will play out in the lower courts before there is a rush to legislate.”
It’s common for Congress to respond to court rulings with legislative tinkering, and many observers were predicting that the loser in this case would ask politicians for help. In a concurring opinion on Monday, Justice Stephen Breyer practically invited action from Congress, noting that “the legislative option remains available.”
But Monday’s unanimous opinion–which largely sided with record labels and movie studios but did not go as far as they had hoped–seemed to quell any thoughts of an immediate legislative response.
Related
- Supreme court ruling! File sharing companies liable for copyright infringement!
- Congress wants to question college IT officers about illegal file-sharing
- New file-sharing techniques may test court ruling
- US Congress Passes Anti-Campus File-sharing Requirements
- Congress: ‘Can P2P and File-Sharing Programs Lead to a Cyber Pearl Harbor?’
