May 20 2005

Canadian court deals setback to record labels

  • Written by moneoa
  • No Comments

A Canadian appeals court has rebuffed an attempt by the recording industry to unmask 29 people accused of unlawfully sharing thousands of music files.


The Federal Court of Appeal on Thursday upheld a lower court’s ruling that said privacy rights must supercede the record labels’ copyright claims, at least in “the early stages of this case.”


In a 27-page opinion, the appeals court stressed that “technology must not be allowed to obliterate” intellectual property rights, but “the potential for unwarranted intrusion into individual personal lives is now unparalleled.”


The ruling is hardly the end of the matter. Instead, it effectively lays out what kind of legal standard the Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) must meet in future lawsuits against accused peer-to-peer pirates.


“If the U.S. experience is any indication, we can expect thousands of suits against individual Canadians in the months ahead,” University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist wrote in an analysis. “There is now every reason to think that Canadians will be subjected to a similar legal barrage.”


In 2004, a lower court declined to order five Internet service providers–Bell/Sympatico, Rogers Communications, Shaw Communications, TELUS and Videotron–to identify subscribers that CRIA had accused of trading files illegally. CRIA appealed the decision, and arguments were heard in April.


In Thursday’s ruling, Justice Edgar Sexton gently chided the lower court for reaching a sweeping decision about whether music file swapping was legal. “In my view, conclusions such as these should not have been made in the very preliminary stages of this action,” Sexton wrote. “Such hard conclusions at a preliminary stage can be damaging to the parties if a trial takes place and should be avoided.”

Related Posts

  1. Canadian record labels appeal P2P ruling
  2. Music swappers win key court battle
  3. Canadian values vs the CRIA
  4. Court Helps Record Labels Define KaZaA’s ‘Shared Folder’ in Lawsuit
  5. Canadian Record Labels Call ISP Music Tax a ‘Pipe Dream’
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • soulxtc: Exactly. The only way to fight P2P is to inspect each and every data packet. If I have to choose between totalitarianism...
  • Victim of PirateBay: lol PirateBay SUCKS you go to thier website and all of a sudden you are attacked with viruses and spyware. Anyone that l...
  • Yatti420: UTP isn't the throttling part.. You want UTP enabled if you run behind a Sandvine box though thats for sure.. ...
  • Norway Court Denies Request to Block The Pirate Bay: [...] (Norske Filmbyråers Forening) over demands that it prevent customers from accessing Swedish BitTorrent tracker si...
  • Spanish Culture Minister: No “3-Strikes” for File-Sharers: [...] comes after the recent decision by the European Union to drop a crucial amendment (#138) from its much anticipated...
  • @TheHuxCapacitor: Hmmm, Couple of things for me - There's no causal relationship proven in the study between P2P and decline in sales...
  • ACTA impone la tutela del Copyright al di sopra di tutto « YBlog: [...] Zelanda, Olanda, U.S.,  Germania, Italia, Ungheria dai siti più popolari nel web come Gizmodo, Zeropaid, Arstech...
  • Stan: I would love to get Ayn Rand's perspective on this situation. The labels may have changed, but the selfishness, ...
  • sdsd