Apr 25 2005

French court bans DRM

  • Written by moneoa
  • No Comments

In a decision sure to reverberate loudly throughout the international music industry, France’s Paris Court of Appeals has decided embedding digital rights management (DRM) software in DVDs is incompatible with an individual’s right to make copies for his/her private use.


Now, Les Films Alain Sarde and Studio Canal have one month to strip copy-protection technology from their DVDs, says 01.net.


On top of that, Alain Sarde and Universal Pictures Video France have been ordered to financially recompense a man who’d copied David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive, and French consumer rights association UFC-Que Choisir, who’d defended him.


In a case involving French consumer rights association UFC-Que Choisir and Les Films Alain Sarde and Studio Canal, UFC-Que Choisir acted for a movie lover who wanted to copy Mulholland Drive (produced by Alain Sarde and Studio Canal) to watch with his mother, who doesn’t have a DVD player.


“In France, people are authorized to make copies of works as long as they’re only for private use,” says Ratiatum’s Guillaume Champeau. “French copyright law is quite clear on that.”


In its decision, the appeals court also ruled that DVD producers have failed to fully inform customers in that the indication “CP” for copy protected was found to be so small size as to make it hard to see.


“As a result of the judgement … Alain Sarde and Universal Pictures Video France must pay the individual concerned 100 euros in reparation and they and Studio Canal have to pay him a further 150 euros, as well as 1,500 euros to UFC-Que Choisir,” says 01.net, adding that the Syndicat de l’édition vidéo is considering, “taking the case to the next level of the judiciary”.


Read the story @ P2Pnet News

Related Posts

  1. Another Court Bans DVD X Copy
  2. DADVSI / Apple Law update : French Constitutional Court Decision strengthen the Law against the Publ
  3. French Court Busts Google Video for Reposted Copyrighted Content
  4. French Court – File-Sharer’s IP Addresses Were Illegally Obtained, Conviction Overturned
  5. French Court – Private Copying is Not a Right
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • john o: would appreciate an invite to iptorrents as demonoid is still down. if i am lucky then Thank U. ...
  • Lethal: 1337x.org is owned by a two faced, retarded, 55 year old child molester named "Mustangx". He will promise you ...
  • malcolm hume: The times are getting shorter though, used to be forever before a video release and now it's a couple of months. So...
  • malcolm hume: The whole release schedule thing is annoying, but it helps them pay for the movies and minimize the risk. Most of the m...
  • malcolm hume: They're not trying to stop piracy altogether. They know there's a few people who will go to the trouble to do ...
  • malcolm hume: The other thing is, the basic system we have is Capitalist. Trying to change that by making artists conform to a seperat...
  • malcolm hume: Well, the first one is mob rule and I think if we go down that road we'll have a lot more probelms than not being a...
  • malcolm hume: Ummm, no? ...
  • sdsd