Jan 26 2005

Social Networks, the solution to a dilemma?

  • Written by moneoa
  • No Comments

By: Coty Cunningham (Zp Commentator, Independent Journalist)

P2P, the reign of copyrighted and pirated materials, the “dilemma” that haunts the RIAA and agencies alike has stayed strong since the legal battles of Napster.

People once said that file sharing would not last and that it was taking a turn for the worst, two statements that have been proven false. The battle between users and anti-piracy agencies has just begun, the increase in lawsuits and piracy acts has just fueled the continuous research and development for the next generation of p2p networks.

Distribution of copyrighted and pirated materials will continue to be shunned by anti-piracy agencies, and smiled upon by the users taking part in the distribution.

The RIAA and MPAA will continue to file lawsuits against users and users will continue to distribute illegal materials, networks will be monitored and some shutdown, what is the solution to this on going dilemma? What can be done by developers of these p2p networks to eliminate these agencies from monitoring and shutting down these networks?

Social Networking, the basic idea of sharing files with people you know could revolutionize file sharing just as the protocol known as Bit Torrent has previously achieved by finding a medium between upload and download rates, distributing file distribution.

Why social networking?

Based on the simple principle of “trust” Users are able to share files in a safe and secure manor with out the need of a centralized network or bloated software.

Rather, users are only required to download client software in which they can find friends and add them to their ‘friends’ list or join ‘private’ hubs known to media networks as “darknets”. By developing social networks rather than trying to develop the next and best network, developers would find that basing a network on the simple principles of freedom and trust, could redefine peer-2-peer.

Allowing for a user to set permissions on his or her files allows a user to feel as safe or unsafe as they so chose to be rather than developing a network where all users share with all other users in a completely open network where anyone even the RIAA or MPAA could monitor users and their files being shared. Why not allow users total control over their files? What would it hurt? Surely not efficiency, speed or network integrity

Related Posts

  1. LimeWire Goes Social, to Allow Private P2P Networks
  2. “We Are Hunted” Ranks Music Using Social Networks, P2P
  3. Limelight Networks Solves Multiple Download Dilemma With New ‘BulkGet’ Technology
  4. US government funds social network snooping
  5. Torrent Swapper Goes Social
Zeropaid on Facebook
Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • mpsharp.com Blog » Watching NFL games online: [...] show you a number of streams to choose from for each game.  All the streams require some sort of StreamTorrent pl...
  • ejonesss: no it is not going to completely stop piracy because while it will stop those whose reason for piracy is quality it is n...
  • file sharing anonymously - P2Pfreak.com: [...] and Trusty Files) just google any one of them and you will get some great info. also here IP filtering with uTorr...
  • soulxtc: Wasn't aware people were guaranteed jobs...
  • mountain_rage: BTW Youtube is supposed to go 1080P soon :D....
  • Gibbbo: Unfortunately the European stores still don't have anything close to the selection available in the USA store. I'm buyin...
  • STUDY: Artists Earn More in a P2P World: [...] personal favorite is the “The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P File-Sharing on the Purchase of Music: A Study F...
  • D.AN: So a stupid plan has been become a doubly-retarded plan....
  • sdsd