Jun 30 2004

ISPs Found Not Liable for Customer’s Infringement

  • Written by dubstylee
  • No Comments

Internet service providers cannot be held liable for the copyright infringement of their subscribers, even when a cached copy of a work is held on local servers, a Canadian court has ruled.

The decision on Wednesday marked an important victory for the country’s ISPs, which were worried about being held legally or financially responsible for subscribers’ use of peer-to-peer and other music downloading services.

A lower court decision had said that, in general, ISPs should not be responsible for their subscribers’ actions, but creating locally stored versions of copyrighted content, even if they were made only temporarily during the transmission process, might be enough to trigger liability. The higher court disagreed.

“The creation of a cache copy is a serendipitous consequence of improvements in Internet technology, is content neutral…and ought not to have any legal bearing on the communication,” the court said in its decision. “Caching is dictated by the need to deliver faster and more economic service and should not, when undertaken only for such technical reasons, attract copyright liability.”

The decision follows almost a decade of litigation and national regulatory appeals. Canadian music publishers and songwriters had originally asked that ISPs and Web sites that distribute music pay a tariff similar to the one applied to blank tapes, CDs and, more recently, hard-drive MP3 players such as iPods. That tariff is aimed at compensating musicians for copyright infringement using those mediums, and the publishers thought Net services should also pay.

But Canadian law, like U.S. legislation, holds that ISPs simply serve as a conduit for content that flows to their subscribers from Web sites and other originating points. The court Wednesday said that shields them from copyright liability.

Related Posts

  1. Canada – Bloc Leader Wants ISPs Liable for Copyright Infringement
  2. EFF: ‘Limewire Not Liable for Copyright Infringement, Users Are’
  3. Supreme court ruling! File sharing companies liable for copyright infringement!
  4. Exclusive: Rogers – We Won’t Just Hand Customer Information Over to CRIA
  5. (UK) Music industry demands the right to sue ISPs
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • CuriousAlchemist: As far as viruses and spyware and such is concerned, here are the Norton specs on te page. http://safeweb.norton.com/r...
  • JONN ROBBO: BACKSTABBING SCAMMING SITE!!! THATS FOR SURE AND ALL THEY DO IS HACK YOU AND REPORT YOU THATS WHY IAM MAKING SURE THIS S...
  • CuriousAlchemist: why is it that whenever a group believes in something, anyone "defaming" that belief "has not opened thei...
  • D.AN: Guess who has the "'right' to access" to stuff put in public, for the public to "access". The public, obviously. A...
  • D.AN: "This a conclusion drawn " should read "This conclusion is drawn "...
  • D.AN: "do not make any logical sense." There is a distinction between logic and speculation. "One thing does not follow ...
  • D.AN: "... this meaningless data is used to justify abrogating the rights of artists all over the world, and make a ridiculous...
  • @mejmej: well i will never use this stuff!!! ...
  • sdsd