Jun 30 2004

ISPs Found Not Liable for Customer’s Infringement

  • Written by dubstylee
  • No Comments

Internet service providers cannot be held liable for the copyright infringement of their subscribers, even when a cached copy of a work is held on local servers, a Canadian court has ruled.

The decision on Wednesday marked an important victory for the country’s ISPs, which were worried about being held legally or financially responsible for subscribers’ use of peer-to-peer and other music downloading services.

A lower court decision had said that, in general, ISPs should not be responsible for their subscribers’ actions, but creating locally stored versions of copyrighted content, even if they were made only temporarily during the transmission process, might be enough to trigger liability. The higher court disagreed.

“The creation of a cache copy is a serendipitous consequence of improvements in Internet technology, is content neutral…and ought not to have any legal bearing on the communication,” the court said in its decision. “Caching is dictated by the need to deliver faster and more economic service and should not, when undertaken only for such technical reasons, attract copyright liability.”

The decision follows almost a decade of litigation and national regulatory appeals. Canadian music publishers and songwriters had originally asked that ISPs and Web sites that distribute music pay a tariff similar to the one applied to blank tapes, CDs and, more recently, hard-drive MP3 players such as iPods. That tariff is aimed at compensating musicians for copyright infringement using those mediums, and the publishers thought Net services should also pay.

But Canadian law, like U.S. legislation, holds that ISPs simply serve as a conduit for content that flows to their subscribers from Web sites and other originating points. The court Wednesday said that shields them from copyright liability.

Related Posts

  1. Canada – Bloc Leader Wants ISPs Liable for Copyright Infringement
  2. EFF: ‘Limewire Not Liable for Copyright Infringement, Users Are’
  3. Supreme court ruling! File sharing companies liable for copyright infringement!
  4. Exclusive: Rogers – We Won’t Just Hand Customer Information Over to CRIA
  5. (UK) Music industry demands the right to sue ISPs
Zeropaid on Facebook
Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • ejonesss: no it is not going to completely stop piracy because while it will stop those whose reason for piracy is quality it is n...
  • soulxtc: Wasn't aware people were guaranteed jobs...
  • mountain_rage: BTW Youtube is supposed to go 1080P soon :D....
  • Gibbbo: Unfortunately the European stores still don't have anything close to the selection available in the USA store. I'm buyin...
  • STUDY: Artists Earn More in a P2P World: [...] personal favorite is the “The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P File-Sharing on the Purchase of Music: A Study F...
  • D.AN: So a stupid plan has been become a doubly-retarded plan....
  • UK POLL: File-Sharers Buy More Music: [...] most recent was “Consumer Culture in Times of Crisis,” conducted by the the BI Norwegian School of Management,...
  • Jiji: Charlie, which competitor torrent site are you a fan of exactly? Or is it a copyright enforcement agency? And if they've...
  • sdsd