Jun 30 2004

ISPs Found Not Liable for Customer’s Infringement



Internet service providers cannot be held liable for the copyright infringement of their subscribers, even when a cached copy of a work is held on local servers, a Canadian court has ruled.

The decision on Wednesday marked an important victory for the country’s ISPs, which were worried about being held legally or financially responsible for subscribers’ use of peer-to-peer and other music downloading services.

A lower court decision had said that, in general, ISPs should not be responsible for their subscribers’ actions, but creating locally stored versions of copyrighted content, even if they were made only temporarily during the transmission process, might be enough to trigger liability. The higher court disagreed.

“The creation of a cache copy is a serendipitous consequence of improvements in Internet technology, is content neutral…and ought not to have any legal bearing on the communication,” the court said in its decision. “Caching is dictated by the need to deliver faster and more economic service and should not, when undertaken only for such technical reasons, attract copyright liability.”

The decision follows almost a decade of litigation and national regulatory appeals. Canadian music publishers and songwriters had originally asked that ISPs and Web sites that distribute music pay a tariff similar to the one applied to blank tapes, CDs and, more recently, hard-drive MP3 players such as iPods. That tariff is aimed at compensating musicians for copyright infringement using those mediums, and the publishers thought Net services should also pay.

But Canadian law, like U.S. legislation, holds that ISPs simply serve as a conduit for content that flows to their subscribers from Web sites and other originating points. The court Wednesday said that shields them from copyright liability.

Related

  1. Canada – Bloc Leader Wants ISPs Liable for Copyright Infringement
  2. EFF: ‘Limewire Not Liable for Copyright Infringement, Users Are’
  3. Supreme court ruling! File sharing companies liable for copyright infringement!
  4. Exclusive: Rogers – We Won’t Just Hand Customer Information Over to CRIA
  5. US Court Finds isoHunt Liable for Copyright Infringement
Zeropaid on Facebook

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...



  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups


  • RJH: The US government will cease to exist before file sharing does. I would bet anything on that....
  • dave: fucking hypocrite. Supposedly standing up for human rights all over the world but wants to adopt totalitarian Internet c...
  • Pirate Home Page » IFPI Claims “3-Strikes” Can Remove Single User, Not Household: [...] Spokesperson also tells audience at the Congressional Internet Caucus’ State of the Net conference that ther...
  • Pirate Home Page » ACTA Falling Apart?: [...] ACTA has been called many things over the years since it was first leaked online, but an all around failure was ce...
  • Niklas Starow: Manual pingback http://dnmr.blogg.se/2010/february/acta-falling-apart-thanks-to-internet-activis.html...
  • @collentine: Interesting but might as well be the opposite with all the secrecy surrounding it....
  • Prove It: Since when has anyone believed the MPAA or RIAA to promote open transparency? This article doesn't submit any FACTS,...
  • chickmagnet 43: awesomer...
  • sdsd