Jan 29 2004

P2P companies say they can’t filter

  • Written by cpugeniusmv
  • No Comments

Responding to sharp criticism from legislators, a group of file-swapping companies told Congress that they have no ability to block copyrighted files or child pornography from their networks.

As part of a lengthy letter to Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-N.C., the P2P United trade association said Wednesday that file-swapping companies should not be held to a standard that is technologically infeasible.


Lawmakers “have been deliberately misinformed by self-interested industry about the technological capability of peer-to-peer services,” said Adam Eisgrau, P2P United’s executive director. “It is not that we won’t filter out copyrighted material and inappropriate sexual material. It’s that we can’t.”



The group’s claim, backed up by considerable technical documentation, comes as calls for filtering of file-swapping networks are rising in Congress and in courts.


Graham and a quartet of other legislators sent a letter to P2P United’s member companies last November, asking for assurances that the file-swapping companies would attempt to stop illegal material from being traded through their networks.


Most pointedly, the letter asked that the companies work to create some kind of filters that could block copyrighted material and pornography.


File-swapping companies have contended that this kind of filter is impossible in a decentralized system such as Gnutella or Kazaa.


In older file-swapping services such as the original Napster, in which searches were routed through a central point, a filtering mechanism was more feasible.


But in wholly decentralized networks, in which searches radiate out through a constantly shifting array of “nodes,” or individual computers, filters are impractical, the group said. Only by forcing the networks to change into something else–a centralized system, for example–would effective filters be useful, the group added.


Read more

Related Posts

  1. Kazaa Could Filter Copyrighted Music, Critics Say
  2. P2P firms ask RIAA to prove that filtering can work
  3. Australia Continues Plan to Have ISPs Filter ‘Inappropriate’ Content
  4. P2P companies may face new scrutiny
  5. Aussie Minister: “I Never Wanted to Filter P2P”
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • john o: would appreciate an invite to iptorrents as demonoid is still down. if i am lucky then Thank U. ...
  • Lethal: 1337x.org is owned by a two faced, retarded, 55 year old child molester named "Mustangx". He will promise you ...
  • malcolm hume: The times are getting shorter though, used to be forever before a video release and now it's a couple of months. So...
  • malcolm hume: The whole release schedule thing is annoying, but it helps them pay for the movies and minimize the risk. Most of the m...
  • malcolm hume: They're not trying to stop piracy altogether. They know there's a few people who will go to the trouble to do ...
  • malcolm hume: The other thing is, the basic system we have is Capitalist. Trying to change that by making artists conform to a seperat...
  • malcolm hume: Well, the first one is mob rule and I think if we go down that road we'll have a lot more probelms than not being a...
  • malcolm hume: Ummm, no? ...
  • sdsd