LONDON -(Dow Jones)- The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, or IFPI, said Friday that the earlier ruling on Kazaa by the Dutch Supreme Court is flawed, but still leaves no doubt that the vast majority of people using file-swapping services like Kazaa are acting illegally, whatever country they are in.
Following the decision, the international recording industry has issued a call to Kazaa take three key steps necessary to help deal with the large numbers of unauthorized copies of copyrighted products that remain available through its service.
IFPI believes the Dutch judgment is based on a one-sided presentation of the facts in very limited summary procedures. In particular IFPI believes that Kazaa is able to control and filter, and thus should be held responsible for, infringements taking place on its service.
IFPI said the only evidence heard in the Dutch case on this critical point was put forward by Kazaa itself.
IFPI said the ruling is likely to be of minor importance as it will almost certainly be overtaken by future decisions based on a full airing of the facts. Notably there is a separate case brought against Kazaa’s successors by the recording and film industries in the U.S., in which such evidence will be considered.
Kazaa itself defaulted from this U.S. case, which would have forced it to face a full consideration of the facts.
Responding to the judgment, IFPI called on Kazaa to act responsibly and deal with the ongoing infringements taking place via its service, by stopping people distributing copyrighted music by changing the default setting for users of the service; by explicitly notifying Kazaa users that uploading copyrighted music without permission is illegal, whatever country they are in; and by filtering Kazaa’s service in order to protect copyrighted works from unauthorized distribution, transmission and copying.
IFPI’s view is that Kazaa is clearly able to take these steps and control the uses of its system, despite its protestations to the contrary.
Allen Dixon, general counsel and executive director of IFPI, said: “The Dutch judgment is flawed because it was based on a one-sided presentation of the facts as put forward by Kazaa.
“We believe that any full airing of the facts would produce a different decision – including in the Netherlands.
“In any case, this decision has no bearing at all on the single most important fact, which is that people who are distributing copyrighted music over such systems – and that means the vast bulk of all users – are breaking the law.”
