Aug 13 2003

Jane Doe vs. RIAA: Users Fight Back

  • Written by
  • No Comments


      Share

In a USA TODAY story this morning not yet published online (USA Today – August 13, 2003 – Page 3D), Mike Snider reports that Sacramento attorney Daniel Ballard will be taking the fight back to the music industry with the expected filing this week of a lawsuit against the RIAA.

USA TODAY reports that as of this date, more than 1,200 subpoenas have been issued, and court clerks are seeing more every day.

One such subpoena recepient, known currently only as “Jane Doe,” has hired Ballard to sue the RIAA for not proving that illegal file distribution actually occured on her machine.

“Just because a user’s PC has music stored within a peer-to-peer file-sharing program doesn’t mean the user is illegally distributing copyrighted material,” said Ballard.

“Distribution implies sending, rather than leaving something where it may be taken,” Ballard added.

Because the RIAA is currently requesting subpoenas based on searching for song titles and corresponding users’ IP addresses, Ballard believes he has a strong case because the RIAA apparently doesn’t actually attempt to download songs found on users’ systems to prove that distribution has occured.

Fred von Lohmann, at attorney for the EFF, told USA TODAY that the suit brings “another dimension to the fight.”

IN RELATED DEVELOPMENTS –

Verizon’s appeal against the court decision which got the RIAA started with their blizzard of subpoenas is scheduled for September 16.

Columbia University has joined two colleges in Massachusetts in their motions to quash the subpoenas issued against their students for being “defectively” filed in the wrong circuit court.

The RIAA has complied with subpoenas issued by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee of Investigations, turning over copies of all of its subpoenas against file swappers. Chairman Senator Norm Coleman, (R-Minn.) demanded the information and is concerned about potential subpoena power abuse by the RIAA and others.

Users are holding their breath to see if the RIAA actually files suit against them. The RIAA claims it will begin suing users in stages (probably a few hundred at a time) beginning later this month or early September.

Related

  1. MIT May Fight Second RIAA Subpoena
  2. RIAA Quickie Subpoenas Shot Down by Judge
  3. RIAA Profits Nearly $100 Million by Suing P2P Users
  4. EFF Working to Make RIAA Subpoenas Public
  5. Verizon user’s arguments already defeated in court, RIAA states
Zeropaid on Facebook

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...



  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups


  • Scary Devil Monastery: Stealthnet is what comes to mind - imagine Kazaa/Gnutella but with AES-256 encryption, immunity versus man-in-the-middle...
  • UK MPs to Allow Blocked Sites to Appeal: [...] this month I mentioned how Liberal Democrat Lord Clement-Jones had proposed an amendment to the Digital Economy Bi...
  • luke: i GOT Mute, and many more ways to be undetectable, they are somewhat slow but work, and his right, VPN is the best one r...
  • Jared Moya: usenet, VPN, secure http, darknets, etc., etc.......
  • Nate: Good article! I'm using http://www.vpntunnel.se/en/ to surf anonymous it cost only €5 a month for unlimited bandwid...
  • petiii: Can I get an invite to torrentleech please? e-mail: petikee01@gmail.com...
  • Mike: Old people are funny when they try to understand technology lol. Music has been free for 10 years and no one's going t...
  • jhion rheeb: im new to pcs as ive just duel booted with windows 7 using bootcamp (if you havent already done this do it is the most u...
  • sdsd