RSS
Home > News > Songspy Beta 2.0 in just a few short days?
Sep 28 2001

Songspy Beta 2.0 in just a few short days?

  • Written by Matt
  • No Comments

On the Songspy website (which is almost NEVER upadated) got an update! This is the complete message that was posted: “September 28th, 2001
SongSpy is now alive a kicking like a crack-addict… (ehem). Well, tell your friends and be sure to get yourself a peace of the action! Some things, like user stats and lost password recovery are being worked on, but you can get online. Also, keep your pants on because in just a few short days we debut Beta 2.0 with bug fixes and a new interface!” Check out Songspy

Related Posts

  1. Can Songspy Tell Time?
  2. Hooray!… Songspy XE
  3. SongSpy on the Fritz???
  4. Songspy More Reliable!
  5. Songspy Shut Down
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • john o: would appreciate an invite to iptorrents as demonoid is still down. if i am lucky then Thank U. ...
  • Lethal: 1337x.org is owned by a two faced, retarded, 55 year old child molester named "Mustangx". He will promise you ...
  • malcolm hume: The times are getting shorter though, used to be forever before a video release and now it's a couple of months. So...
  • malcolm hume: The whole release schedule thing is annoying, but it helps them pay for the movies and minimize the risk. Most of the m...
  • malcolm hume: They're not trying to stop piracy altogether. They know there's a few people who will go to the trouble to do ...
  • malcolm hume: The other thing is, the basic system we have is Capitalist. Trying to change that by making artists conform to a seperat...
  • malcolm hume: Well, the first one is mob rule and I think if we go down that road we'll have a lot more probelms than not being a...
  • malcolm hume: Ummm, no? ...
    • sdsd