Nov 25 2002

Dangerous Meeting in Washington

  • Written by cheapprick
  • No Comments

WASHINGTON–Technology and entertainment lobbyists will sit down at the negotiating table Friday to seek a resolution to the long-running political spat over digital copyright.

About 20 lobbyists are expected to meet at the Eye Street offices of the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), just two blocks from the White House, to try and find common ground before the new Congress starts in January 2003.

The companies and trade associations represented at the closed-door meeting include Microsoft, Verizon Communications, the Business Software Alliance, AOL Time Warner, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the Fox Entertainment Group.

Political tension between the tech industry and the media industry has rarely been more acute. Faced with mass piracy on peer-to-peer networks and increasingly efficient technologies under development, the MPAA and its allies in the recording industry have asked Congress for sweeping new laws.

All sides of the dispute have reached an impasse. It’s easier for lobbyists to block legislation than enact it, but if online piracy continues to flourish, the new Congress could be far more receptive to new copyright proposals. All sides would prefer to reach a compromise at the bargaining table than risk the political uncertainty of committee votes, legislative delays, and last-minute amendments to bills.

Friday’s meeting is designed to start the negotiating process, and CDT’s Davidson said he had no idea how it would end. “We don’t know what the outcome will be, but we’re hopeful that we can make progress in representing what has been an underrepresented voice–consumers,” Davidson said.

Read the original article here.

Related Posts

  1. P2P State of the Union.
  2. Peer2Politics: House Subcommitee meeting on P2P piracy
  3. Copyright Industry Stacks Town Hall Meeting In Their Favour
  4. Washington Tries Its Best To Kill Internet Radio
  5. RIAA Meeting Stormed by Pirates!
Zeropaid on Facebook
Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • mountain_rage: It isn't unreasonable if it was 1 license that covered all music, and proven that they actually played the music before ...
  • skillsss: Comcast Censoring Conservative Voices? The American Public and the FCC need to keep an eye on ISPs. Comcast has been ...
  • mountain_rage: That is the downside to the radio model, all artist are tied in, and can't choose to give away their music for free to e...
  • I.Jackson: It's not unreasonable to ask a venue that presents live music (or recorded music) to pay a fee. After all, they are usi...
  • DrewWilson: It's not entirely a surprise this is happening if you ask me. I haven't been around to witness the music scene for 20 y...
  • CHRIS: It's sad that people can make money off of you, but won't take the time to answer any of your questions. I think VUZE, I...
  • Neil: I don't think it's unreasonable to ask venues a small fee for radio, jukeboxes, and live music, but it really needs to b...
  • mountain_rage: The sad part is that even with all 3 licenses the facility can still be sued, since those 3 don't cover all artist. Pers...
  • sdsd