Oct 31 2002

RIAA Wins Injunction Against Madster

  • Written by wiggum
  • No Comments

The RIAA have been involved in a long running case against Madster. Recently the Judge ordered the RIAA to show how copyrighted material could be filtered on Madster. The RIAA submitted a document showing how they claimed it could be done. In responding to the document Madster parted company with it’s lawyer and missed several deadlines for responding. Now the Judge has sided with the RIAA’s method of filtering and told Madster to filter copyrighted material from it’s network. Specifically Madster must in addition to disabling access to copyrighted works, it must monitor its system and to keep a list of “any and all sound recordings and musical compositions” being made available. That list must be shared with record companies upon five business days notice. It seems it must set up a system where files get pre-approved.

The fight is not over.. Johnny Deep still says that he cannot filter on the network. The Madster network is still up and running.

Read more here

Related Posts

  1. RIAA Files Proposed Wording for Madster Injunction
  2. Madster Given Extension to Respond to Request for Filtering
  3. Madster Ignoring Court Order to Filter
  4. Madster Removes its Own Lawyer
  5. Madster Ignoring Court Order Again
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • john o: would appreciate an invite to iptorrents as demonoid is still down. if i am lucky then Thank U. ...
  • CuriousAlchemist: As far as viruses and spyware and such is concerned, here are the Norton specs on te page. http://safeweb.norton.com/r...
  • JONN ROBBO: BACKSTABBING SCAMMING SITE!!! THATS FOR SURE AND ALL THEY DO IS HACK YOU AND REPORT YOU THATS WHY IAM MAKING SURE THIS S...
  • CuriousAlchemist: why is it that whenever a group believes in something, anyone "defaming" that belief "has not opened thei...
  • D.AN: Guess who has the "'right' to access" to stuff put in public, for the public to "access". The public, obviously. A...
  • D.AN: "This a conclusion drawn " should read "This conclusion is drawn "...
  • D.AN: "do not make any logical sense." There is a distinction between logic and speculation. "One thing does not follow ...
  • D.AN: "... this meaningless data is used to justify abrogating the rights of artists all over the world, and make a ridiculous...
  • sdsd