According to this CNET News.com article it looks like we’re in for dejavu of the battle over net broadcasting fees. The central arguments by both sides are, “The new rates underpay artists who are providing the raw materials for Webcasters’ businesses, say the record labels, which will get about 50 percent of the new royalties. Webcasters say they fees are still too high, and will drive small businesses and hobbyists off the digital air.” They’ve changed something in the Matrix!
Webcasters and record labels Wednesday each said they would ask a federal court to overturn a controversial new set of fees, setting off yet another round of squabbling over Internet radio. The new royalties were imposed in June by the Librarian of Congress, overturning a previous recommendation by a federal arbitration panel. The fees split the difference between rates suggested by labels and Webcasters, but both sides have continued to cry foul.
The new rates underpay artists who are providing the raw materials for Webcasters’ businesses, say the record labels, which will get about 50 percent of the new royalties. Webcasters say they fees are still too high, and will drive small businesses and hobbyists off the digital air. Both sides now want the court to decide…
More sources:
- CNET’s News.com, related item: Radio site boosts charges to Webcasters
- InfoWorld: Both sides appeal Net radio ruling
- BayArea.com’s Mercury News: Music royalties for Net under fire
- Nando Times: Recording industry group appeals Web royalties ruling
Related Posts
- Feds cut Webcasters a break on fees
- Internet radio dealt severe blow as Copyright Board rejects appeal
- Radio stations appeal Web royalties
- RIAA War With Webcasters Really a War on Indie Artists and Labels?
- Traditional radio stations have to pay royalties for Net streaming
Loading ...
