<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Govt Asks for Input on Proposed Copyright Agency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Essay for Information Society &#171; Laceylu&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/#comment-188744</link>
		<dc:creator>Essay for Information Society &#171; Laceylu&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-188744</guid>
		<description>[...] Soulxtc, (2009) UK Govt Asks for Input on Proposed Copyright Agency, [online] Available from &lt;http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/&gt; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Soulxtc, (2009) UK Govt Asks for Input on Proposed Copyright Agency, [online] Available from &lt;<a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/&#038;gt" rel="nofollow">http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/&#038;gt</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: South Korea to Become 1st Country with &#8220;Three-Strikes&#8221; for File-Sharers?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/#comment-187370</link>
		<dc:creator>South Korea to Become 1st Country with &#8220;Three-Strikes&#8221; for File-Sharers?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-187370</guid>
		<description>[...] UK is still brainstorming on how best to approach the problem, New Zealand has decided to seek more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UK is still brainstorming on how best to approach the problem, New Zealand has decided to seek more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/#comment-178463</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178463</guid>
		<description>I have an option for them revert copyright back to a commercially applicable law revert the extensions that have been illegitimately added over the years and let the industry re sort how to function under fair copyright. The current copyright systems creates unfair monopolies that hinder creative development and competition among artists. Independent research keeps showing that filesharing and the like has no measurable effect on sales so why are we punishing society for sharing culture a long standing human quality? Government is here for the people and to follow what the society that elected them believes is fair so lets start listening to them rather than giving some elitists some ill deserved power.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an option for them revert copyright back to a commercially applicable law revert the extensions that have been illegitimately added over the years and let the industry re sort how to function under fair copyright. The current copyright systems creates unfair monopolies that hinder creative development and competition among artists. Independent research keeps showing that filesharing and the like has no measurable effect on sales so why are we punishing society for sharing culture a long standing human quality? Government is here for the people and to follow what the society that elected them believes is fair so lets start listening to them rather than giving some elitists some ill deserved power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrewWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10052/uk_govt_asks_for_input_on_proposed_copyright_agency/#comment-178464</link>
		<dc:creator>DrewWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178464</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of a digital rights advocacy organization but I fear that such an organization could be tainted by comercial interests who would exploit such an organization in a way that doesn&#039;t benefit the people they are charged to protect.

If I remember right the Home Office was suppose to protect the safety of British citizens but when the Phorm company came around the Home Office was tumbling over themselves trying to sell out the rights of people to the distress of many watchdogs just for the benefit of a company wanting to hijack people&#039;s browsers at the expense of consumer privacy.  What Phorm was wanting to do was actually illegal but since money could be made laws and morals be damned.

I&#039;m not against a digital rights advocacy organization just don&#039;t let them become another mouth piece for the IFPI an organization that has been trying to transform laws into what they feel is most suitable - at the expense of everyone including the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of a digital rights advocacy organization but I fear that such an organization could be tainted by comercial interests who would exploit such an organization in a way that doesn&#8217;t benefit the people they are charged to protect.</p>
<p>If I remember right the Home Office was suppose to protect the safety of British citizens but when the Phorm company came around the Home Office was tumbling over themselves trying to sell out the rights of people to the distress of many watchdogs just for the benefit of a company wanting to hijack people&#8217;s browsers at the expense of consumer privacy.  What Phorm was wanting to do was actually illegal but since money could be made laws and morals be damned.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not against a digital rights advocacy organization just don&#8217;t let them become another mouth piece for the IFPI an organization that has been trying to transform laws into what they feel is most suitable &#8211; at the expense of everyone including the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-15 01:00:22 -->
