<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA STILL Suing File-Sharers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:19:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ConfusedMime</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/#comment-187668</link>
		<dc:creator>ConfusedMime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-187668</guid>
		<description>Well thats no big suprise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thats no big suprise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1cooldude</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/#comment-187660</link>
		<dc:creator>1cooldude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-187660</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-178485&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-178485&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;soulxtc&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
It’s 9 not 901….read exhibit A
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
The claim is based on 9 separate files but the total number of downloads under that IP was 901. They have been watching this guy for a while. As far as RIAA&#039;s claim that they will not be any further lawsuits I would place that into a fantasy section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-178485"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-178485" rel="nofollow">soulxtc</a> :</strong><br />
It’s 9 not 901….read exhibit A
</p></blockquote>
<p>The claim is based on 9 separate files but the total number of downloads under that IP was 901. They have been watching this guy for a while. As far as RIAA&#8217;s claim that they will not be any further lawsuits I would place that into a fantasy section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notbob</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/#comment-178481</link>
		<dc:creator>notbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178481</guid>
		<description>I love you soulxtc!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love you soulxtc!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrewWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/#comment-178482</link>
		<dc:creator>DrewWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178482</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve skimmed through the PDF and yes it does say 901 but look at Exhibit A and you&#039;ll see only 9 identified audio files even though it says there are 901 audio files in question.  Yes the article took the complaint out of context a little but one has to wonder why say 901 when there is only &quot;evidence&quot; of 9 files.  I&#039;ve made the correction anyway.

Added to this this is merely a cosmetic correction as the point of the article was to point out that the RIAA lied when they said they would end their lawsuit campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve skimmed through the PDF and yes it does say 901 but look at Exhibit A and you&#8217;ll see only 9 identified audio files even though it says there are 901 audio files in question.  Yes the article took the complaint out of context a little but one has to wonder why say 901 when there is only &#8220;evidence&#8221; of 9 files.  I&#8217;ve made the correction anyway.</p>
<p>Added to this this is merely a cosmetic correction as the point of the article was to point out that the RIAA lied when they said they would end their lawsuit campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notbob</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/#comment-178483</link>
		<dc:creator>notbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178483</guid>
		<description>I wish I wasnt so lame and had better things to do with my sad lonely existence. Anybody want to be my friend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I wasnt so lame and had better things to do with my sad lonely existence. Anybody want to be my friend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/#comment-178484</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178484</guid>
		<description>Common Soul can&#039;t take Notbob&#039;s jibs? 

Anyway the RIAA isn&#039;t suing people anymore now they are litigating them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Common Soul can&#8217;t take Notbob&#8217;s jibs? </p>
<p>Anyway the RIAA isn&#8217;t suing people anymore now they are litigating them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soulxtc</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10044/riaa_still_suing_filesharers-2/#comment-178485</link>
		<dc:creator>soulxtc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178485</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s 9 not 901....read exhibit A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s 9 not 901&#8230;.read exhibit A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
