Show your leechamer stats

**Mel_Smiley** · March 29th, 2003, 04:40 PM

while there are alot of zero files shared users, people actually sharing is far greater.

hey wheres my new winmx?

**Sockfulloflove** · March 29th, 2003, 04:49 PM

here's my stats:

**Lamourlady** · March 29th, 2003, 04:50 PM

i'm not on quite that often...as u can see.....the zero files, just surpass those other users.

**Mel_Smiley** · March 29th, 2003, 05:05 PM

Thats alot of leechs!
Maybe we should tell what we are sharing too.

audio

video

or porn video

other

I share mostly video and sometimes porn

**grab_grab_the_haddock** · March 29th, 2003, 05:13 PM

Originally posted by Mel_Smiley
Now im more curious. what kinda files are ya sharing?
For me its mostly BBC shows and cartoons.

i share a bunch of useless text files, viruses and pictures of my dog bouncer so i can bypass your anti leeching tools.

**Mel_Smiley** · March 29th, 2003, 05:18 PM

good for you grab. Glad to see you help people with their pet fetish and screw up peoples computers. WOW what a nice guy

**Evil_Dweller_01** · March 29th, 2003, 05:27 PM

Originally posted by grab_grab_the_haddock
i share a bunch of useless text files, viruses and pictures of my dog bouncer so i can bypass your anti leeching tools.

I saw your other replies in the other LeechHammer thread.. so I know what you are talking about grab...

**Mel_Smiley** · March 29th, 2003, 05:35 PM

What grab doesnt get is that LeecHammer will hammer him if no one downloads his crap files in a certain amount of time, which kinda helps with that but by no means stops the leechers

**grab_grab_the_haddock** · March 29th, 2003, 06:06 PM

Originally posted by Mel_Smiley
What grab doesnt get is that LeecHammer will hammer him if no one downloads his crap files in a certain amount of time, which kinda helps with that but by no means stops the leechers

I am led to believe that leechhammer only hammers "suspicious" user after a certain amout of time. i.e users who have at least 500 files and never upload. I only have a few files so dont qualify as a "suspicious user"

**Mel_Smiley** · March 29th, 2003, 06:20 PM

Point taken. Didnt know the suspicious point is 500, which seems odd to me anyway and the issue should be looked into

anymore pics?

**The Hunter** · March 29th, 2003, 06:25 PM

What I want to know is how are these judgements made, as I have used Win Mx for quite a while, and am sharing over 4gig of songs. I hardly ever download anything these days. Tonight I am getting booted on a regular basis, while sharing 7 slots, with a 15k upload set. This was a small share as I was working on a request for a few songs. If this is caused by being hammered i will be leaving the program very shortly.

**Mel_Smiley** · March 29th, 2003, 06:37 PM

I dont think you would ever be hammered sharing 4 gigs of music. You can set your own prefered number of files shared a user must have before they get hammered. More than likely your having just a bad night like i am it seems, it has taken forever to even find sources for my ques. Maybe i should result to begging like everyone else! lol

**The Hunter** · March 29th, 2003, 06:46 PM

I am not using hammer, just Win Mx, and sharing. What I am seeing is most of my downloads being killed. i have never had to resort to tools like that. If it is caused by the fact that at times I am not sharing rap, or nipple slip, i am not impressed. Is this controlled by the the # of active uploads? As sometimes I have few hits, and other times many. I have always preached sharing.