Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: U.S. top court upholds TV profanity crackdown

  1. #1

    gone into the sunset

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,698

    U.S. top court upholds TV profanity crackdown

    WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court upheld on Tuesday a U.S. government crackdown on profanity on television, a policy that subjects broadcasters to fines for airing a single expletive blurted out on a live show.

    In its first ruling on broadcast indecency standards in more than 30 years, the high court handed a victory to the Federal Communications Commission, which adopted the crackdown against the one-time use of profanity on live television when children are likely to be watching.

    The case stemmed from an FCC ruling in 2006 that found News Corp's Fox television network violated decency rules when singer Cher blurted out an expletive during the 2002 Billboard Music Awards broadcast and actress Nicole Richie used two expletives during the 2003 awards.

    No fines were imposed, but Fox challenged the decision and a U.S. appeals court in New York struck down the new policy as "arbitrary and capricious" and sent the case back to the FCC for a more reasoned explanation of its policy.

    The FCC, under the administration of President George W. Bush, had embarked on a crackdown of indecent content on broadcast TV and radio after pop star Janet Jackson briefly exposed her bare breast during the 2004 broadcast of the Super Bowl halftime show.

    Before 2004, the FCC did not ordinarily enforce prohibitions against indecency unless there were repeated occurrences.

    By a 5-4 vote and splitting along conservative-liberal lines, the justices overturned the ruling by the appeals court and said the FCC's new policy and its findings in the two cases were neither arbitrary nor capricious.

    "The agency's reasons for expanding its enforcement activity, moreover, were entirely rational," Justice Antonin Scalia said in summarizing the court's majority ruling from the bench.

    "Even when used as an expletive, the F-word's power to insult and offend derives from its sexual meaning," he said.

    Government lawyers in the case have said the policy covered so-called "fleeting expletives," such as the "F-word" and the "S-word" that denote "sexual or excretory activities," respectively.


    Source...

  2. #2
    mountain_rage's Avatar

    Zeropaids nipple

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    purgatory
    Posts
    7,069
    Wow Bush can say he did something while in office. He quashed profanity and female nipples from prime time tv. He must be proud.
    Anyone upset or offended by my post please follow the link and let your opinions be known.
    http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=55492

  3. #3

    gone into the sunset

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,698
    Do not wish to deviate from the topic but I am always puzzled by American view on public sexuality while killings and open murders are alright to display.I always think of George Carlin's "Seven Words You Can't Say on TV". A tickler for sure.:slaphappy:

Similar Threads

  1. 1111101000 AKA Sexy Spam!
    By cpugeniusmv in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 11297
    Last Post: February 8th, 2012, 10:26 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: August 29th, 2003, 05:20 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 14th, 2003, 05:49 PM
  4. U.S. Supreme Court enters DeCSS.exe case
    By wessman in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: January 4th, 2003, 05:10 AM
  5. Lessig's Thoughts On Eldred v. Ashcroft Arguments
    By wessman in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 14th, 2002, 05:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •