Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: House Caves, Approves Fake 'Compromise' on Telecom Immunity

  1. #1
    HelenaP's Avatar

    go luath.. céanna go luat

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    An bealach fada chun an bhaile
    Posts
    6,091

    Post House Caves, Approves Fake 'Compromise' on Telecom Immunity



    Press Releases » June, 2008


    Washington, D.C. - Privacy rights and the rule of law took a serious blow today when the House of Representatives passed blanket retroactive immunity for phone companies that participated in the president's warrantless surveillance program. The FISA Amendments Act, H.R. 6304, which House Leadership rushed to the floor today after its introduction yesterday, passed by a vote of 293 to 129. The Senate is expected to vote on the bill next week.

    The bill was touted as a bipartisan "compromise" on the issues of electronic surveillance and immunity. But in fact it requires dismissal of lawsuits against companies like AT&T that participated in the program as long as the companies received a piece of paper from the government indicating that the surveillance had been authorized by the president and was determined to be lawful.

    "Immunity for telecom giants that secretly assisted in the NSA's warrantless surveillance undermines the rule of law and the privacy of every American," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. "Congress should let the courts do their job instead of helping the administration and the phone companies avoid accountability for a half decade of illegal domestic spying. If this legislation passes the Senate and is signed into law, the American people will have lost their last best chance to discover the true scope of the president's wiretapping program and to determine whether or not the law was broken."

    "We are deeply disappointed that the House Leadership, which was so courageous in its previous opposition to telecom immunity, caved to the Administration's fear-mongering and put this seriously flawed legislation on the floor for a vote," said Bankston. "We look to leaders in the Senate who value the rule of law to stand up and strongly oppose this blanket immunity for telecom lawbreakers, and in particular urge Senator Barack Obama to lead his party in rejecting this false compromise."

    EFF is representing the plaintiffs in Hepting v. AT&T, a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of the millions of AT&T customers whose private domestic communications and communications records were illegally handed over to the National Security Agency (NSA). EFF has been appointed co-coordinating counsel for all 47 of the outstanding lawsuits concerning the government's warrantless surveillance program.

    Source- EFF



    Click here to read how the House Approved the Surveillance Bill to Protect Telecoms

    The most Beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious.
    It is the source of all true art and science.
    ~ Albert E.


  2. #2
    Drew Wilson's Avatar

    AKA IceCube

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Igloo Country?
    Posts
    9,659
    I reported on this myself and also found an additional press release from the ACLU if it helps any:

    http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9580/US...g+-+293+to+129

    Enjoy. :)

  3. #3
    El Comandante's Avatar

    Merde!

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Deep in the Jungle
    Posts
    2,387
    Quote Originally Posted by HelenaP View Post
    "Immunity for telecom giants that secretly assisted in the NSA's warrantless surveillance undermines the rule of law and the privacy of every American," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. "Congress should let the courts do their job instead of helping the administration and the phone companies avoid accountability for a half decade of illegal domestic spying.
    This is what happens when corporations forget that the courts interpret the laws and not the executive branch. That Congress makes the laws and not the executive branch. If these companies had a doubt they could have easily filed for an injunction or a declaratory action by the courts. They should all pay stiff penalties for allowing the our government to spy on Americans. They knew what the laws were. It's an egregious breach of privacy.
    “La patria es dicha, dolor y cielo de todos y no feudo ni capellanía de nadie.”
    - José Martí

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •