Why doesn't anyone talk about audioGnome

[MusicMan]

I don't see why no one likes audioGnome as an open nap server. It connects to the widest range of servers, is a bit resource hogging, but makes it up with a bizillion files to choose from. All I hear about is WinMX, when I believe audioGnome is truly superior. What do you guys think about audioGnome?

[Matt]

I don't know. It isn't used very much because WinMX usually takes all their OpenNap credit.

[MusicMan]

I think it really should be used more often, it's obviously superior to WinMX, stupid WMX taken all the credit, I'll blow them in to SMILEY FACE DUST :fire :hole :black

[Crazy Horse]

I still use AudioGnome when I go OpenNap and I use WinMx. I like AudioGnome but it would be better if they worked on it more often. I would like to see muti-source come to OpenNap.:gj

[MusicMan]

Yea, I've noticed audioGnome hasn't put out an update since the year 2001, I really hope they didn't give up on it, (a bunch of people at the old Napster Fourms, including me, tried to get everyone to switch to it when Napster shutdown).

[Crazy Horse]

Music Man - On AudioGnome, where you go to view suggestions, that 1st post about multi-source & better interaction with WinMx was posted by me over a year and a half ago - the last time they updated & then it was just an installer. Still my old stand-by for OpenNap.

[MusicMan]

Wow, they REALLY haven't updated it in a long time.