I just found out that user Malakai1911 is jumping on me in this forum..
I'll just point out the facts and the readers wil choose who is talking bullshit and who is not.
1. 2-spyware.com - shady name? :) its his personal opinion.
2. trojanhunter never was #1 on our site. Malakai seems dont understand the difference between the spyware and trojans. of course the tests are different and the results are different.
3. He is calling me a scum and he didnt even read all information to the end. And didnt even look if what he is found is Correct info.
3.1. the answer to webhelper4u is written here: http://www.kiguolis.com/archives/200...of-defamation/
3.2. I never pushed any spyware on my site. We help to remove spyware not to advertise it. Read the info again and try to findwhere I push spyware. I can pay somebody $1000 if they will find that somewhere I push spyware.
3.3. the link where he says that I'm arguing with oher user is not true.. I am not registered on that site. Jurgita is not me. And Malakai read the discussion to the end there.
3.4.in the malakais list there I own the sites more than half of sites are not mine. Check the information.
So readers of zeropaid forums can simply decide who is talking bulshit, who is not. All the reviews in 2-spyware are checked and written after the numerous tests. Any personal opinion about the owners of site ussually are the dirty talk of competitors.
I am really sad that Malakai Joined this dirty game.
Originally Posted by Malakai1911
What are you looking for me to add to the already negative things I listed?
You are considered by some to be a vandal at Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ugnius
"Please refrain from using the vandalism template tags on the user pages of editors with whom you have a content dispute."
"RainR called you on your spam. I called you on your spam and I'm sure others will too when they have a look at your website."
And are an admitted ban-evader:
"There is no reason to ban access to your page, we can access to it through proxy. ugnius"
Everywhere you seem to post you (or your co-worker, or your alternate personalities) make enemies:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13506062
http://forums.maddoktor2.com/index.p...topic=268&st=0
http://spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?p=15461
You advocate internet censorship:
"Nowadays Internet is full of spywares, viruses and adult sites it's very important to control our kids
activity on Internet. So parents should consider an opportunity to get a good Internet filtering software."
- http://www.spyware.lt/pdf/kids-and-internet-139-en.pdf
You have used material from other websites, and even if it wasnt your fault you still vicariously promoted copyright infringement by using material from spywareguide without attribution or permission:
http://web.archive.org/web/200404020...m/articles.php
http://web.archive.org/web/200404010...e.com/term.php
You seem to have layouts jacked from other websites too.
http://anti-spyware-review.toptenreviews.com/
vs.
http://www.2-spyware.com/compare.php
In my opinion, Littlebits was just plain wrong for even trusting your website. And as far as I'm concerned, so are others.
My security guide @ Zeropaid
Unless you are the following people, I do not particularly wish to associate with you:
Krell, HelenaP, mountain_rage, mfgbypooter, Mels_Smileys45, excrement_cranium.
That's it for now. This list will be updated whenever I feel like it.
ah so instead of reading and proving what you said before you are trying to add more nonsence things. thats a good start to a discussion. Why dont you try to prove something?
1. wikipedia? did you read what is wriiten there? there is no any vandalism there. Its a dispute. you are trying to defame me again.
2. ban evader? nobody is banned on my websites. And there are sited who dont like the truth and bans users. so who is bad?
3. its you who see enemies. I dont see them and I dont have any. Its a open disscussions not somekind of enemy making. So who is started this discussion? now you are my enemy? Who started to defame? Do you have at least some facts to start taliking this bullshit or you are just reposting some bullshit from others without any doublechecking?
4, yes. SO? these days its impossible otherwise. Or you think that parents should be responsible that their kids saw some harmfull popups or sites?
5. read that discussion again regarding copyrighs. Its was an open discussion. there is no any infringement. spywareguide removed their article because nothing was stolen. and only comments in some sites still remains.
6. its you opinion. nobody hijacked anything.
So basically instead of facts you are tring to read some 2-3 years old bullshit on internet and make your own bullshit like it some new information.
Find the facts and get a $1000 dollars from me. none of your so called facts are true. Try to prove any of them. Thank you
Its you choice to trust or not to trust a website. You still didnt provided ant arguments and proof s of what you found in comments of other sites. You just got into dirty game of competition.
its getting HOT here, but nice info from both of you
so for the other readers:
ugnius and littlebits = only 1
>>infoseeker / jhempelayo<<
suck utorrent/bittorrent
what? :))))))))
another myth starts to emerge..
If you mean they're the same person, I dont think so... ugnius has terrible command of written english compared to littlebits.
2-spyware got into an argument with spywarewarrior (afaik, the first trusted site to study a whole host of fake spyware software)
"For spywarewarrior.com and suzi Proves doesn't exist. She tell that there is freedom of speech and she thinks that she can tell anything without punishment."
- http://www.2-spyware.com/articles/general/37.html
...would you trust an article with terrible grammar?
'Nowadays, almost every man or woman in U.S. has the access to the World Wide Web and use it more or less often."
I has the access! This theme is repeated throughout the entirety of 2-spyware.com.
As far as I'm concerned, I've proven two things.
...I've linked all your bullshit together and wouldnt trust a single inflammatory statement that comes out of your mouth. You can discredit what I've linked too all you want, but when someone takes a step back and looks at the whole picture, they will know exactly what is up.
...and littlebits should do more research before trusting anyone or anything. Lest we end up in an argument with crazy foreigners in the future.
My security guide @ Zeropaid
Unless you are the following people, I do not particularly wish to associate with you:
Krell, HelenaP, mountain_rage, mfgbypooter, Mels_Smileys45, excrement_cranium.
That's it for now. This list will be updated whenever I feel like it.
No sorry NOT the same person. I wasn't aware of this ongoing dispute with 2spyware.com.ugnius and littlebits = only 1
I simply found this website by searching on Yahoo. I have read all of the info posted above and it sounds like a soap opera. I really don't want to get involved with.
For the reviews at this site, I do agree with most of them. I searched all of the internet trying to find a good review site. Most of the reviews that I found were completely bogus listing sorry bad Anti-Spyware products.
Spyware Warrior has some of the best reviews but is NOT updated to current. As products change and new products get developed, they should get reviewed again. That's why some of the info on Spyware Warrior is not accurate.
2spyware and Spyware Warrior review freeware products, unlinke the rest of the bogus reviews that only review paid products and pushing sorry products to the top of their list.
Anti-Trojan reviews are completely different on every website that I found.
Some say TrojanHunter is the best, others say Ewido or a-squared.
Since their really isn't a way for me to test this products without installing trojans to my pc, I did install all of them and scaned my clean pc just to see what they would find.
TrojanHunter found 1 false positive.
Ewido found 6 false positives.
a-squared found 13 false positives.
Sometimes I wonder if the Anti-Trojan reviews count the false posities as real Trojans giving them
a higher review score.
Thanks.:icon_salu
SORRY (what a shame) :icon_shak
:icon_blac but in other side, the discussion gets little bit cool :icon_scra
suck utorrent/bittorrent
yes we argued with Suzi "spywarewarrior" few years Ago.
Guess what: We've got official apologise from Suzi and SpywareWarrior. You can Find it in SpywareWarrior website. And its written in this article you gave the link. You simply dont read everything.
Regarding english, yes there are mistakes, its not me who writes the articles, there are lots of people working on site. But thank you for your critics, we will fix that.
Again, I dont know what did you prove... Nothing, just posted 2-3 years old comments from other sites. But if you feel satisfied, I'm happy for you.
You simply dont understand that even if there were something not quite good in the past, it is past and its nothing like that anymore. there were some issues and everything was fixed. There are some issues now, like grammar, but it will be fixed too.
I wonder will you post the same bullshit after 10 years as a new information again?
that what you did is not professional, you didnt do your own research, you posted information without your own verification. Anyone can write some stupid things in internet and you will treat it as a truth?
ugnius
Semi official response:
This test was done SOME time ago, with many "trojans" which are NOT trojans to us or any good scanner. Can you imagine simply a .bat file containing nothing but the following one line which fails to DO anything, on any PC in the world except the original infected PC:
copy xyjtdzh.exe c:\windows\system32\
Is this a trojan ? experts agree it is not.
Tests from massive archives of OLD VIRUSES (.com infectors, overwriters etc) none of which are in the wild, should NEVER be used for accurate representation of how a product is performing.
TrojanHunter concentrates on current problems - constantly changing and large amounts of new malware, we eliminate an estimated extra 100,000 trojans, backdoors (including nearly ALL of the open source SDBOT and other IRC bot problem) with one simple addition in TH 4.6 (generic registry detection).
The next versions will be including new generic file scanning designed to detect REAL world threats. Instead of listening to others opinions, on OLD tests with JUNK and broken files throughout, and masses of files we do not WANT to detect (why should every product detect the same anyway?) we urge users to try each of a few top scanners themselves, periodically.
No product detects everything, I see new malware every day and nothing ever gets close to full detection, GOOD HEURISTICS is taking over as the most important thing in a scanner. This is why new scan technology is being created for current and future threats.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks