Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Australian Court Rules Against KaZaA

  1. #1

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3

    kazaa case - found guilty (just onthe radio)

    Just onthe radio here in Sydney...
    They've been found guilty and have been given 2 months to modify kazaa to allow only licenced material from their software

    more to follow

    Dandermouse

  2. #2
    Mels_Smileys45's Avatar

    JabberZombie

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Forman's Basement
    Posts
    16,236
    Is this real? How the hell will they do that?




    Hard as ever and here to make you people believe...as long as there is one person to hold hope and dream...A GOD...will never die!

  3. #3

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3
    dunno,

    check this out

    SYDNEY (Reuters) - An Australian court ruled on Monday that users of Kazaa, a popular internet music file-swapping system, breached music copyright and ordered its owners to modify the software.

    Australian court rules Kazaa users breach copyright

    Dandermouse

  4. #4

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    p2pconsortium.com i live
    Posts
    6,446

    Australian court rules Kazaa users breach copyright

    An Australian court ruled on Monday that users of Kazaa, a popular internet music file-swapping system, breached music copyright and ordered its owners to modify the software.

    "The respondents authorised users to infringe the applicants' copyright in their sound recordings," Federal Court Judge Murray Wilcox said in his ruling.

    Australia's major record companies sued Kazaa's Australian owners and developers, Sharman Networks, claiming Kazaa had cost them millions of dollars in lost sales.

    The music industry told the court that Sharman Network licensed users to access a network it knew was being used for piracy and hence it was authorising people to infringe copyright.

    Sharman Networks defended the use of the internet to download music tracks, but said it could not control the actions of estimated 100 million world-wide users.


    source
    http://today.reuters.co.uk/News/News...USIC-KAZAA.XML

  5. #5
    DwarfBaby's Avatar

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Nomad
    Posts
    1,873
    It's about freakin time. No, not that the Great Satan won this case (as we all knew he would) but maybe we'll see fewer posts like "I just Installed kazza and everything I download is silent.

  6. #6
    Mels_Smileys45's Avatar

    JabberZombie

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Forman's Basement
    Posts
    16,236
    So will they only have to filter results for Australia? uh huh sure.

    The music industry told the court that Sharman Network licensed users to access a network it knew was being used for piracy and hence it was authorising people to infringe copyright.
    Thats some dazzling bullshit there. So they knew people were doing things they told them not to do. How is that authorising a damn thing. I guess now they'll move on to the next big app, maybe your favorite program or mine. I wonder how effective any of this will be.




    Hard as ever and here to make you people believe...as long as there is one person to hold hope and dream...A GOD...will never die!

  7. #7
    DwarfBaby's Avatar

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Nomad
    Posts
    1,873
    Quote Originally Posted by Mels_Smileys45
    j
    Thats some dazzling bullshit there. So they knew people were doing things they told them not to do. How is that authorising a damn thing. I guess now they'll move on to the next big app, maybe your favorite program or mine. I wonder how effective any of this will be.
    Kind of like driving on I5 in California. Sure the speed limits 70 Miles per hour. But the only people doing the speed limit are those whose ages exceed it.

    Basically, right or wrong the majority rules. You can stand on a podium and denounce evil but if the crowd you’re talking too is what you consider evil then you're the only one who looks like a fool.

  8. #8
    Sparky9's Avatar

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    616
    well thats the last nail in kazaa coffin

  9. #9
    shawners's Avatar

    Hurt no more my son.

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    An angel in Heaven and on Earth
    Posts
    7,899
    Uh. . . .what about all the networks that connect to the fast track network? Urgent message going out through kazaa users urging them to upgrade?? or from now on, downloads would be modified.

  10. #10

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,666
    hmmm... oh well.

    if they allow only licensed content, does that mean that all the fakes will dissapear? :p

    Kazaa sucked of course anyway.


    I suppose that they will just go out of business and concentrate on Skype... they make that too? Because it's an amazingly GOOD program.

  11. #11
    shawners's Avatar

    Hurt no more my son.

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    An angel in Heaven and on Earth
    Posts
    7,899
    did they even did what grokster did, bring up the betamax case?

  12. #12
    Cydor's Avatar

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    world
    Posts
    207
    Quote Originally Posted by Dandermouse
    dunno,

    check this out

    SYDNEY (Reuters) - An Australian court ruled on Monday that users of Kazaa, a popular internet music file-swapping system, breached music copyright and ordered its owners to modify the software.

    Australian court rules Kazaa users breach copyright

    Dandermouse
    It's about time...Burn that Spy-ware fest to the ground...it's long over due.

    It was awesome P2P prog in the begining...but the bastards turn it to money making machine full of Spy-ware.

    It deserves to DIE.

  13. #13

    I wish u were Beer

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    In the Heart of the Evil Empire
    Posts
    1,126
    Yeh....let it die!.

    But if they were smart they would completely redo their software...serverless like they should have long ago.

    OH....AND UPDATE YOUR HASHING!

    but they are stupid...they should have done all that long ago.

    This isn't the end of Kazaa....unfortunately. They are just banned from releasing it in Australia. This is just another judges retoric...trying to control something he can't....all the while taking kickbacks.


    __________________________________________________ _____________

    Kazaa owners, users infringe copyright - judge

    Australian Federal Court Judge Murray Wilcox has ruled that Kazaa owner Sharman Networks and its principals are guilty of copyright infringement.

    Judge Wilcox declared that Sharman Networks Ltd, LEF Interactive Pty Ltd, Altnet Inc, Brilliant Digital Entertainment Inc, Nicola Anne Hemming and Kevin Glen Bermeister "have infringed the copyright" of the 30 or so music labels and copyright owners who brought the case against them. Furthemore, he said, the defendants "authorised" Australian Kazaa users to "make a copy of the sound recordings" and to "communicate the recordings to the public".

    "The files are shared without the approval of the relevant copyright owner," said the Judge in his summary of the case. "It follows that both the user who makes the file available and the user who downloads a copy infringes the owner’s copyright."

    Judge Wilcox was unmoved by Kazaa's incorporation of "warnings against the sharing of copyright files", stating that "far from taking steps that are likely effectively to curtail copyright file-sharing, Sharman Networks and Altnet have included on the Kazaa website exhortations to users to increase their file-sharing".

    He also noted the defendants had not "taken any action to implement... technical measures... that would enable the respondents to curtail – although probably not totally to prevent – the sharing of copyright files".

    The defendants were banned from offering their P2P file-sharing systems in Australia until they modify the software essentially to exclude copyright works from searches. The modification must come in the form of a "non-optional key-word filtering technology", and the company must place "maximum pressure" on existing Kazaa users to upgrade to the modified version of the software. Sharman has a grace period of two months before it must comply with the order.

    Read the Rest here:
    http://www.theregister.com/2005/09/05/kazaa_verdict/
    CAPITAL punishment for infringement is a CAPITAList's dream.

  14. #14
    Krell's Avatar

    worthless dirtball

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,759
    This isn't the end of Kazaa....unfortunately. They are just banned from releasing it in Australia. This is just another judges retoric...trying to control something he can't....all the while taking kickbacks.

    True True!

    One ruling will never change the course for that many stupid people



    .

  15. #15
    shawners's Avatar

    Hurt no more my son.

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    An angel in Heaven and on Earth
    Posts
    7,899
    Id rather it not die, since after they win this, they will go down to other networks.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Kazaa, Kazaa Gold, Kazaa Lite Are they the same?
    By CORRUPTERBUSTER in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: April 28th, 2007, 11:08 PM
  2. KaZaA Lite
    By 12345678910 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: May 30th, 2004, 05:24 PM
  3. Kazaa in court this week
    By RJ5500 in forum News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 8th, 2004, 11:02 PM
  4. Dutch Court Throws Out Attempt to Control Kazaa
    By Durum in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: December 19th, 2003, 11:36 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •