Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: eDonkey 2000 has overtaken BitTorrent study says

  1. #1
    Jorge's Avatar

    Zeropaid God

    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,309

    eDonkey 2000 has overtaken BitTorrent study says

    Cambridge, England - CacheLogic, Ltd. – a world leader in Peer-to-Peer traffic management and network intelligence solutions – today published an updated analysis of worldwide Peer-to- Peer (P2P) traffic detailing the worldwide breakdown of P2P file trading networks. The study confirms that eDonkey 2000 has overtaken BitTorrent™ to become the world’s largest P2P file trading network. The data for this study was obtained through CacheLogic’s Streamsight Analysis Network Program, which enables analysis based on actual packet data and traffic levels obtained from ISPs (Internet Service Providers) worldwide.
    Using the advanced Layer-7 technology found in both its Peer-to-Peer Management Solution and Deep Packet Inspection products, CacheLogic analyzed data from monitoring probes located around the world. The data shows that while BitTorrent remains extremely popular in Asia (with the notable exception of South Korea, where 92% of all P2P traffic is eDonkey), European, North American and Latin American users have shifted to eDonkey for the vast majority of file trading. Specific details of the worldwide geographic breakdown of P2P are available to qualified press and analysts and may be obtained by emailing media representative Jonathan Hirshon at [email protected], subject line ‘CacheLogic Study’.
    “CacheLogic has noted a significant shift in the balance of traffic levels assosciated with the main P2P protocols through our unique access to actual Web traffic data throughout the world,” said Andrew Parker, Chief Technology Officer for CacheLogic. “Over the last six months, the traffic levels for the eDonkey protocol have grown to a level greater than that of BitTorrent. Such file-sharing applications continue to be the single largest traffic burden on ISP networks.”
    To further enhance its ability to offer unique commentary and insight regarding Internet traffic patterns, CacheLogic also announced the free expansion of its Streamsight Analysis Network to a range of new ISPs around the globe. ISPs interested in obtaining a unique window into the data crossing their networks can sign up for the program by visiting http://www.cachelogic.com/san. Upon acceptance (subject to the outlined terms and conditions and at CacheLogic’s sole discretion) program members will receive a free CacheLogic Layer-7 packet analyzer that will provide immediate and specific details on all data types traversing the ISP’s network, including P2P, Instant Messaging, VoIP and other popular protocols and applications.
    “CacheLogic is committed to assisting ISPs as they deal with the ever- changing dynamics of Internet traffic - the global expansion of the Streamsight Analysis Network is a significant step forward in providing the necessary insight into the protocols that define the most popular applications in use by subscribers,” noted Parker.
    Company Background
    CacheLogic is a technology company that provides a suite of complementary products that deliver traffic management and network intelligence solutions to the Internet Service Provider and Telecommunications sectors. In January 2004 CacheLogic set up its analysis network to provide traffic analysis from within ISP networks across the Globe. The network ensures CacheLogic maintains leadership in understanding the changing nature of traffic across the Internet and, in particular, its impact upon Service Provider networks.
    Today through its proven track record, market-leading P2P management solution and its commitment to research and development, CacheLogic is considered the leading authority in its field. CacheLogic provides regular analysis and expert opinion to leading press and analyst organisations.
    Further information can be found at http://www.cachelogic.com

    Read the complete article

  2. #2

    Retired

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    263
    God, not again....

  3. #3
    Krell's Avatar

    worthless dirtball

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,759
    Quote Originally Posted by Julian
    God, not again....
    Are you saying you're tired of hearing about "CacheLogic" when we only have these other threads?

    Using the futuristic search function of Zero Paid only yeilds this:

    http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/search.php?searchid=350324



    .

  4. #4

    Retired

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by Krell
    Are you saying you're tired of hearing about "CacheLogic" when we only have these other threads?

    Using the futuristic search function of Zero Paid only yeilds this:

    http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/search.php?searchid=350324



    .
    No, we already went through this on slyck, there study is 10 pages of colors and circles with no information as to how it was obtained.
    "There is a very thin line between genius and madness"

    ~J.

  5. #5
    Digital Bliss's Avatar

    2+2=5

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Good Question
    Posts
    1,634
    Edonky sucks

  6. #6

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    870
    too right digital bliss donkey suck's
    i dont care who u r!!
    u cant tell me that at the min Donkey reign's!!
    my arse BT F..king rock's(Like a young Mike Tyson-Smash Donkey in 2/3round's-Earlier!!)
    hoot hoot BT

  7. #7
    Auggie2k's Avatar

    Back to business!

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    4,988
    I'm surpised edonkey took over BT, I would have expected BT to catch up and take over, being a newer method of P2P in all. Edonkey only took over because all these noobs haven't a clue how to configure a detailed torrent client so they go for the user friendly programs like emule, limewire or shareaza.

  8. #8

    Registered User

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    52
    Well, I think the queue line and download speeds are quite slow in edonkey.

  9. #9
    MrEricSir's Avatar

    Backwards Bear

    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    22
    I find this incredibly unlikely. These studies about internet traffic are typically bullshit.

  10. #10
    bobhss's Avatar

    Cornerstone 2007

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    750
    Without knowing a lot about Edonkey or this report and how it was generated, my guess is that users of BitTorrent are mixing up their ports (not using the default ones) and Edonkey people are using the default. So, the monitoring they use isn't able to catch traffic that's not on the default port and is not counting it. The newest version of ABC has a default set of ports between 10000 and 60000 and randomizes it's use of those ports. Therefore this report is probably crap.

  11. #11
    Vampmon's Avatar

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    France/England
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Digital Bliss
    Edonky sucks
    Exactly! Rich in content, poor when it comes to download speeds and search results ...

  12. #12

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    203
    if everyone were to use edonkey like when everyone used just napster it wouldnt have the problems it does now. its every one and their mother using their own proietary networks that makes each one suck. that goes for BOTH ed2k and BT.

  13. #13
    shawners's Avatar

    Hurt no more my son.

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    An angel in Heaven and on Earth
    Posts
    7,899
    Not only that most torrent sites that are just offering zero day stuff.. And having it on their sites for no more then 4 weeks are closed groups and trackers. Nothing can be monitored properly with the system they have in place.

  14. #14
    Excrement_Cranium's Avatar

    Just Sick

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Crackivegas, Washington
    Posts
    5,423
    BT is cool for full albums and large files. And using the proper sites a person can find ANYTHING they want under those categories.

    But, Edonkey does pick up on smaller single file traffic.


    If I want to listen to a song by Nelly, I don't need his entire shitty album. :icon_thum
    “The martyr sacrifices themselves entirely in vain. Or rather not in vain; for they make the selfish more selfish, the lazy more lazy, the narrow narrower.” - Florence Nightingale

  15. #15
    MPXX's Avatar

    What Me Worry??

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    273
    eDonkey can suck my eBalls...

    And could you really classify BitTorrent as true P2P?? Or even a "network"..I mean the "P2P" and "network" only go as far as the torrent's tracker does...

    Don't you need a torrent file to download a torrent first???

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Improve BitTorrent Download Speeds
    By Malicious Intent in forum BitTorrent
    Replies: 349
    Last Post: June 30th, 2009, 02:48 AM
  2. Hollywood could not kill bittorrent
    By cuplatnum in forum BitTorrent
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: March 8th, 2007, 07:06 AM
  3. Anatomic P2P - Decentralised BitTorrent
    By crackerjacker in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 18th, 2005, 01:50 AM
  4. BitTorrent gives Hollywood a headache
    By MikeHunt in forum News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: December 10th, 2004, 05:01 PM
  5. BitTorrent: Getting started and FAQ
    By Malicious Intent in forum BitTorrent
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 2nd, 2004, 01:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •