Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Browser makers warned against ad-blocking

  1. #1
    Lord_of_the_Dense's Avatar

    Deicidic Chipmunk Revue

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Jackson County, MO
    Posts
    6,231

    Browser makers warned against ad-blocking

    The end of free Internet content will come when Web browsers start blocking online advertisements by default, a DoubleClick executive has warned.

    Bennie Smith, the online advertising network's privacy chief, told ZDNet Australia the popularity of tools like Adblock -- an extension to the Mozilla Firefox browser -- which makes blocking online ads simple was tied to "a negative vibe against advertising in general".

    However, only the online arena is able to easily produce and widely distribute such tools, he added.

    He said if a similar tool could be produced for newspapers, it would not be accepted by consumers.

    Read entire story here.
    17 USC § 1008 Prohibition on certain infringement actions:
    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the noncommercial use by a consumer for making digital musical or analog musical recordings.

  2. #2

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,666
    boo hoo.

    I don't want to pay for commerical internet. It's just getting more and more free you weiner.

    My site has no ads (that I make money off at least) and you don't see me bitching about high costs and whatnot.

  3. #3
    notbob's Avatar

    I say what I want

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    some town
    Posts
    3,847
    the analogy is flawed to begin with

    the idea of holes in pages pissing people off is outrageou. consumers don't want or need ads, they want content. the loss of ads would force content providers to provide more content

    you don't buy a magazine for the ads. you buy it for the article that catches your attention. in fact, if a magazine is all ads, only an idiot would buy it (which says something about our society and the publishing industry i guess)

    you pay for a magazine. you pay for the internet. fuck ads. why pay twice?

  4. #4
    serrebi101's Avatar

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Canada, (lol you learn something new everyday)
    Posts
    1,243
    I see both sides, but really 10% of the internet population blocks adds, you stil got the 90% or so that are n00b-ish and don't block adds and use IE
    serrebi

    My Twitter

  5. #5

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    460
    The internet was better before all the popup ridden, spyware loading, cookie-spy, corporate sites hit it anyway. Who needs em? They're squatters.

  6. #6
    Betamax's Avatar

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    323
    Adbock doesn't leave any holes, in fact it makes leaves room to fit more on each page. The anaolgy makes no sense.

    ...

  7. #7
    Digital Bliss's Avatar

    2+2=5

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Good Question
    Posts
    1,634
    lol i remember back in the day when their were not many adds at all

  8. #8
    method's Avatar

    yeah, whatever...

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New World Order HQ
    Posts
    1,180
    I guess ad-whores at DoubleClick don't realise some people run their sites on donations... besides... hosting is cheap enough these days.

    Screw DoubleClick and screw their adverts... they're just crying like pussies 'cuz of ad-blocking.
    ||| = + |-|---------No longer lurking...
    m e t h o d-----...Target aquired: BREIN

  9. #9

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    132
    Well, they are bringing in on themselves. Ads have gotten so intrusive, cookies adding spyware, the pictures from ad servers and the like. When it reaches the point that you can't see what you came for because of some idiot ad that flashes all over the place, what can you expect?

    Internet users are slowly becoming more aware as time goes on. I routinely blocked cookies, ad servers, and used a pile of stuff just to prevent the viewing and the like of those ads. We all pay for our internet and like notbob says, why pay twice. Just because business has hijacked the net for their use, doesn't mean we have to agree to it.

    I finally had enough of the Windoze and all it's crap and switched to Linux. With Microsucks selling the OS to users and the licenses to businesses to allow them to gain access through your computer security with spyware and the like enough is enough. I mean you gotta run a spyware hunter (if not more than one to get them all), an antivirus, antitrojan, firewall (Microsucks Fisher-Price reject of a firewall doesn't cut it) and a ton of other things just to gain the control of your machine and to keep it safe. Crap on that. All that stuff costs money. Finally I threw up my hands and just gave up Microsucks. It isn't worth it as an OS to run.

    I suspect many others will rebel in one fashion or another but playing this game of protectism isn't cutting it. For myself, I have dropped out of the Microsucks game.

  10. #10

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coral Springs, Florida, US
    Posts
    810
    I dont block ads on the computer anyway...

    I dont even venture out to websites with more
    than banner ads anyway, sites like that drive
    people away and make for an unpleasant
    experience for everyone.

    If it really is such a big deal for these companies
    with their intrusive advertising thats in your face
    and annoying then maybe it will just show you how
    truely strong the public will become
    (blogging, independantly run websites, instant messaging,
    email, etc.) Why do we even need the giant corporate
    goliaths?

    It will be interesting to see how the problem escalates
    within the next few years, everyone remember spyware
    a few years back? I sure dont, but with companies so
    desperate to push their product on you further you can
    only imagine how much worse the problem will get later.

    But its definitely not going to be the doomsday bullcrap
    theyre talking about.

  11. #11
    Potato's Avatar

    poe-tay-toe

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    7,143
    Maybe the ad company people need to find new jobs. Stop making people view your lame shit, most people don't really look at it anyways. And if you're like me, you think they're stupid and annoying, so you make them go away with RIP.
    Now stop being so freaking nice, and buy a stun gun. - Krell

  12. #12
    tomars's Avatar

    Registered Useless

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    341
    I can see that adverts are an important part of the internet. Although I don't like seeing them and I block them on pages I visit regularly, if browsers did this by default it would (I reckon) have an effect. Its like TV, BBC is ad-less but you have to pay TV-liscence, ITV has ads because they dont get anything from TV liscence.
    Removing ads would force sites to find other sources of revenue - subscription content. High bandwidth free download sites wouldn't exist without ads so I don't know how its going to turn out
    The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them.
    Mark Twain

  13. #13
    ducttapeBigSexy's Avatar

    w00t!

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Over by those boxes
    Posts
    1,018
    Quote Originally Posted by notbob
    you pay for a magazine. you pay for the internet. fuck ads. why pay twice?
    Let's look at this using zeropaid.com as an example. Everyone blocks all ads on this site. Jorge doesn't make enough money off the site. Jorge can't pay his bills. Jorge shuts ZP down. That's why there's ads.

  14. #14
    DwarfBaby's Avatar

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Nomad
    Posts
    1,873
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_of_the_Dense

    However, only the online arena is able to easily produce and widely distribute such tools, he added.

    He said if a similar tool could be produced for newspapers, it would not be accepted by consumers.

    here.
    Wrong, I Tivo everything and skip the commercials. Use XM radio without commercials. I also read the newspaper online; therefore adblocking stops those ads as well. I also close my eyes, cover my ears and hum loudly during coming attractions at movie theaters and I close my eyes while driving to avoid the billboard advertisements.

  15. #15
    Auggie2k's Avatar

    Back to business!

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    4,988
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_of_the_Dense
    Bennie Smith, the online advertising network's privacy chief, told ZDNet Australia the popularity of tools like Adblock -- an extension to the Mozilla Firefox browser -- which makes blocking online ads simple was tied to "a negative vibe against advertising in general".
    A negative vibe against advertising, oh my god I'm so sorry! Are we hurting the poor feeling of the ad companies, oh no I didn't realise! Can I say just one thing.. SHUT THE HELL UP! Nobody can force us into viewing advertisements, we choose what we want to see, not you's greedy bastards! Il use adblock whenever and wherever I want!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Browser Speed Comparisons
    By g-smooth2k in forum General Computing
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: July 7th, 2005, 07:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •