Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Internet Group OKs 'xxx' Web Addresses

  1. #1
    Lord_of_the_Dense's Avatar

    Deicidic Chipmunk Revue

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Jackson County, MO
    Posts
    6,231

    Internet Group OKs 'xxx' Web Addresses

    WASHINGTON - The Internet's primary oversight body approved a plan Wednesday to create a virtual red-light district, setting the stage for pornographic Web sites to use new addresses ending in "xxx."

    The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers said it would begin negotiations with ICM Registry Inc., run by British businessman Stuart Lawley, to iron out technical issues and prices for the new Web addresses.

    Adult-oriented sites, a $12 billion industry, probably could begin buying "xxx" addresses as early as fall or winter depending on ICM's plans, ICANN spokesman Kieran Baker said. The new pornography suffix was among 10 under consideration by the regulatory group, which also recently approved addresses ending in "jobs" and "travel."

    Read entire story here.
    17 USC § 1008 Prohibition on certain infringement actions:
    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the noncommercial use by a consumer for making digital musical or analog musical recordings.

  2. #2
    MPXX's Avatar

    What Me Worry??

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    273
    It's for all those xXx movie sites right...?

  3. #3
    cpugeniusmv's Avatar

    Computer Genius

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    ::1
    Posts
    4,442
    There should be a regulation to keep porn sites exclusively in the .xxx TLD. Not only would it make it easy to block it from those who don't want it, it'd make it easier to find (as if it's not easy already!) for the ones that do!
    Google | cpugeniusmv

    "I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious."
    Albert Einstein

    Ask smart questions!

  4. #4
    Lord_of_the_Dense's Avatar

    Deicidic Chipmunk Revue

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Jackson County, MO
    Posts
    6,231
    I agree. It would be so nice.
    17 USC § 1008 Prohibition on certain infringement actions:
    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the noncommercial use by a consumer for making digital musical or analog musical recordings.

  5. #5
    Excrement_Cranium's Avatar

    Just Sick

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Crackivegas, Washington
    Posts
    5,423
    Probably have to be heavily policed against non XXX domain redirect sites though...
    “The martyr sacrifices themselves entirely in vain. Or rather not in vain; for they make the selfish more selfish, the lazy more lazy, the narrow narrower.” - Florence Nightingale

  6. #6
    ferrarimodena360's Avatar

    Yada Yada Yada

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,556
    Quote Originally Posted by cpugeniusmv
    There should be a regulation to keep porn sites exclusively in the .xxx TLD. Not only would it make it easy to block it from those who don't want it, it'd make it easier to find (as if it's not easy already!) for the ones that do!
    spot on br0
    :icon_rr:

  7. #7
    Lord_of_the_Dense's Avatar

    Deicidic Chipmunk Revue

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Jackson County, MO
    Posts
    6,231

    ICANN Creating Virtual Red-Light District

    NEW YORK - A red-light district tentatively cleared for construction on the Internet — the ".xxx" domain — is being billed by backers as giving the $12 billion online porn industry a great opportunity to clean up its act.

    A distinct online sector for the salacious, one with rules aimed at forbidding trickery, will reduce the chances of Internet users accidentally stumbling on porn sites, they argue. If only it were so simple:

    Zoning in cyberspace has always been a daunting proposition, and participation in the porn domain will be voluntary. Critics wonder why ".xxx" got the OK at all when so many other proposals sit unaddressed, some for years.

    Read entire story here.
    17 USC § 1008 Prohibition on certain infringement actions:
    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the noncommercial use by a consumer for making digital musical or analog musical recordings.

  8. #8
    Auggie2k's Avatar

    Back to business!

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    4,988
    Quote Originally Posted by cpugeniusmv
    There should be a regulation to keep porn sites exclusively in the .xxx TLD. Not only would it make it easy to block it from those who don't want it, it'd make it easier to find (as if it's not easy already!) for the ones that do!
    Smack.. and it's out of the park! Thats the best idea I have heard all year!

  9. #9

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    870
    i also agree,
    its very nice 2 see some work done

  10. #10
    Burd's Avatar

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Agawam, Massachusetts
    Posts
    304
    Hate to disagree, but I do. Suppose they made all file sharing sites end in, say, .share? Then, yes, they'd be easier to find for us, but also for those who want to regulate us. If it's all in one place, it's easier to find and to shut down too! I've said it before: if the Internet is to be a truely useful tool, it needs to be unregulated. That includes the Good with the Bad; otherwise, it's going to be no more useful than radio or televison...and we all know what's happened there. I'm willing to put up with a little annoyance for my freedom.

  11. #11
    Lord_of_the_Dense's Avatar

    Deicidic Chipmunk Revue

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Jackson County, MO
    Posts
    6,231

    ICANN Defers Approval of .xxx Porn Domain

    Plans to provide a domain name for adult-oriented online content were put on hold again by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).

    Vint Cerf, the chairman of ICANN, said yesterday that the .xxx top-level domain issue had been removed from the agenda of an upcoming board meeting while the organization reviews the proposal further.

    The news apparently came as a surprise to everyone, including Stuart Lawley, the president of the .xxx's sponsoring organization, ICM Registry, which has spent millions of dollars getting the bid this far.

    Read entire story here.
    17 USC § 1008 Prohibition on certain infringement actions:
    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the noncommercial use by a consumer for making digital musical or analog musical recordings.

Similar Threads

  1. Next big step for the web or a detour?
    By infringer in forum News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 12th, 2005, 07:00 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •