"Digital cameras won't become as ubiquitous as film because manufacturers became obsessed with features instead of the unmet market," said Chris Chute, digital imaging analyst with IDC. "They were rewarded with market growth, but once they filled that bucket there wasn't any other bucket to fill."
Shipments will be strong in the next couple years but will slow and then dip over the long term, research firm IDC forecast in a report Thursday. Indications are that the market will peak prematurely, missing the opportunity to replace film cameras as the predominant method of taking photos--instead the market will be made up of a more diverse range of devices with photo capturing abilities, such as cell phones and other combination devices.
The digital camera is still viewed as a PC peripheral limiting its reach over the long term. Consumers are also shifting their buying patterns and instead of focusing on megapixels, they're turning to prices, which are also dipping. Average selling prices for cameras will fall from last year's $340 to $295 by the end of 2005 and $200 by 2009.
Manufacturers will be re-evaluating their roles in the digital camera market during the next 18 months, Chute said.
The top digital camera makers worldwide and in the United States are Canon, Hewlett-Packard, Kodak, Olympus and Sony.
Why isnt Nikon on the list?
I think they make pretty good cams
______________________________________________
In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.
Because CNet wrote the article..
there's slycktom! what do u think of the new news format guy?
"there's slycktom! what do u think of the new news format guy?"
Hey Dub! To be honest, the news should be a lot more prevalent. When I come to the site, the most obvious thing I see is the Google ad. It should be moved directly right of your logo. Also consider dumping the pornographic ads...
Other than that, I like it!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks