i2p-bt versus ants

[ABC_thellookoflove]

Hi

since searches in ants are not working and in ad hoc never will work properly,
and ants has no media because of the lack of a direct connection to edonkey,

the questionis why i2p with bt is not much better.

So the run is ants versus i2p-bt

isn´t I2p much a better routing mechanism ?
as well for emule, shareaza etc ?

8 weeks of programming to let those network connect to i2p, shareaza developers say.

So we should discuss here, why ants routing is better than i2p routing.

[Abyss00]

...why ants routing is better...

What makes you think it is better?

[xrobot]

8 weeks of programming to let those network connect to i2p, shareaza developers say.

Good news. Competition push p2p technology.

But, just as the case of TOR(http://tor.eff.org, they said that they don't want p2p traffic due to the capacity problem), will the i2p network welcome p2p traffic?

[ABC_thellookoflove]

see here, a http protocol like gntuella is best

http://forum.i2p.net/viewtopic.php?t=238

http://forum.i2p.net/viewtopic.php?t=221

http://www.emule-web.de/board/showth...&highlight=i2p

http://www.emule-web.de/board/showth...&highlight=i2p

http://forums.shareaza.com/showthrea...threadid=37837

http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=28211

http://forum.emule-project.net/index...4&#entry536834

[fnordprefect]

ABC For farks sake, stop your ridiculous spam. Here, the I2P mailing list, and everywhere else.
We are not interested in your dumbass, poorly written opinions and we don't want to visit your lame, browser hijacking website/s.

You want Ants/Emule/whatever hybrid communicating over I2P?....Do it your bloody self and stop whining at the rest of us.

Just go away. When come back, bring code, or don't come back.

[ABC_thellookoflove]

its not about reading a post,
read always smething to learn
networking is the way to go.
actually matrixnet brought the threads along and I am shure, that even gwren has never thought, that ants dc protocol can run over i2p. ;-)


i2p´s saftey and ants saftey have still to be discussed, which is better.
i think in i2p you see the number of peers, and there are a lot of IP connections, In ants you only have 5 neihbours as direct ip adresses, if I2p has more ip adresses, ants is better.
Need to do netstat for i2p.
case: one torrent tracker is only on i2p wuith 100 users.
i2p has 100 users for me, so i knwo all 100 users, only the ip adresses are mixed. I do not know, which one is the seeder, but i see all 100 interested.
so this is bad, in ants i see only 5 ip adresses.
How many ip adresses are direct connected with i2p if i am runnig it ?
This should be displayed , which they are.
Otherwise ants is the way to go with ID numbers.

[fnordprefect]

Pure gibberish.

[ABC_thellookoflove]

http://www.ipants.tk
and
http://www.i2phex.tk

are the both to compare.

[tsafa1]

I don't know, I think it is overkill.