Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Is it true that SHA-1 has been broken

  1. #1

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    120

    Is it true that SHA-1 has been broken

    Well that is what this article says:
    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?si...46218&from=rss

    If true then ..... what

    Regards
    Chris

  2. #2
    Afn's Avatar

    Smarter than the average

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,436
    Quote Originally Posted by CactusChris
    Well that is what this article says:
    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?si...46218&from=rss

    If true then ..... what

    Regards
    Chris
    Quote Originally Posted by slashdot
    Relax... it still takes 2^69 tries. That is 590,295,810,358,705,651,712 hash operations. To brute force sha-1 it takes 2**80. This is only 2**11 times faster then a brute force attack... thats 2048 times faster. Its significant but it's not that big of a deal. It is no more significant then if someone with a 2000 node cluster tried to brute force your hash (which is completely feasible...especially for large government agencies like the NSA). In other words, if you were capable of performing 1 trillion (1,000,000,000,000) hash operations per second, it'd still take nearly 19 years for a collision to be found. I assume the NSA can knock that number down to under 24 hours, but thats expected of them. For anyone else in the world, assuming your not being followed by the NSA... and god help you if you are... sha-1 will still be fine and the entire internet security infastructure will not need to be redesigned.
    Interesting but bit torrent hashes are ok for now. That could change with faster processors, but nothing to worry about anytime soon, unless you plan to be here when we have 1 or 100 trillion hash functions per second on a single desktop.
    Is it not a feat sublime? Intellect hath conquered time.

  3. #3
    Digital Bliss's Avatar

    2+2=5

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Good Question
    Posts
    1,634
    you forgot windows its self and active x in your poll :p

  4. #4
    cpugeniusmv's Avatar

    Computer Genius

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    ::1
    Posts
    4,442
    Quote Originally Posted by Digital Bliss
    you forgot windows its self and active x in your poll :p
    wrong thread?

    in regards to sha-1: read the comments in the article. i wouldn't worry about it.
    Google | cpugeniusmv

    "I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious."
    Albert Einstein

    Ask smart questions!

  5. #5
    Abyss00's Avatar

    Anonymous Pirate

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    274
    Yeah, is sounds like you need a supercomputer to be able to break it.

    Don't know of many supercomputers that sit around with nothing to do but break SHA-1. lol

  6. #6
    cpugeniusmv's Avatar

    Computer Genius

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    ::1
    Posts
    4,442
    Quote Originally Posted by Abyss00
    Yeah, is sounds like you need a supercomputer to be able to break it.

    Don't know of many supercomputers that sit around with nothing to do but break SHA-1. lol
    /me looks down in his basement

    i don't have a basement
    Google | cpugeniusmv

    "I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious."
    Albert Einstein

    Ask smart questions!

  7. #7
    Abyss00's Avatar

    Anonymous Pirate

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    274
    /starts making plans to break into cpugeniusmv's basement

  8. #8
    black_magiic's Avatar

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Coolsville
    Posts
    2,344
    I shall join you in that endeavour.

  9. #9
    infringer's Avatar

    *Proud ZP & US citizen*

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Other Side Of Your Screen.
    Posts
    1,765
    Unless theres a simple Exploit on the OS of a security device itself to get the information would be take a phenominal amount of time...

    -infringer-
    My favorite comical commercial!!!

    By the MPAA...
    ______________________________________________
    | I | illegal downloading inappropriate for all ages. |

  10. #10

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    38
    IBM's Cell chip anyone?

    I wonder, from what i heard that chip has awsome number crunching ability, and you can have as many as you want clustered together. I wonder how many years before these will be available, and then how fast could they crack it....

Similar Threads

  1. Commit True Crime Online On Your PC!
    By ROCKAMANIAC in forum Windows
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 3rd, 2004, 12:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •