Well that is what this article says:
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?si...46218&from=rss
If true then ..... what
Regards
Chris
Originally Posted by CactusChris
Interesting but bit torrent hashes are ok for now. That could change with faster processors, but nothing to worry about anytime soon, unless you plan to be here when we have 1 or 100 trillion hash functions per second on a single desktop.Originally Posted by slashdot
Is it not a feat sublime? Intellect hath conquered time.
you forgot windows its self and active x in your poll :p
wrong thread?Originally Posted by Digital Bliss
in regards to sha-1: read the comments in the article. i wouldn't worry about it.
Google | cpugeniusmv
"I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious."
Albert Einstein
Ask smart questions!
Yeah, is sounds like you need a supercomputer to be able to break it.
Don't know of many supercomputers that sit around with nothing to do but break SHA-1. lol
/me looks down in his basementOriginally Posted by Abyss00
i don't have a basement
Google | cpugeniusmv
"I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious."
Albert Einstein
Ask smart questions!
/starts making plans to break into cpugeniusmv's basement
I shall join you in that endeavour.
Unless theres a simple Exploit on the OS of a security device itself to get the information would be take a phenominal amount of time...
-infringer-
My favorite comical commercial!!!
By the MPAA...
______________________________________________
| I | illegal downloading inappropriate for all ages. |
IBM's Cell chip anyone?
I wonder, from what i heard that chip has awsome number crunching ability, and you can have as many as you want clustered together. I wonder how many years before these will be available, and then how fast could they crack it....
Bookmarks