THEY and various music-movie studios are pinging quite a bit each day the suit
here is interesting--
This is the html version of the file http://www.citizen.org/documents/SchoenDecl.pdf.
G o o g l e automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache...-0-0-1%3C/A%3E)&hl=en
Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted: net 68 43 0 0 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIABMG MUSIC, a New York general partnership; LAVA RECORDS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; PRIORITY RECORDS LLC, a California limited liability company; ARISTA RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation; SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT INC., a Delaware corporation; LONDON-SIRE RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation; FONOVISA, INC., a California corporation; INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a California general partnership; ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., a Delaware corporation; LOUD RECORDS, LLC, a Delaware corporation; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY, L.P., a California limited partnership; MAVERICK RECORDING COMPANY, a California joint venture; and ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,Plaintiffs,v.DOES 1 – 203,Defendants.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::CIV IL ACTION NO. 04-cv-650DECLARATION OF SETH SCHOENI, Seth Schoen, declare as follows:1.I am a Staff Technologist with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and make this declaration on my own personal knowledge.2.The purpose of this declaration is to set forth facts, which were readily available to the Plaintiffs from free, public Internet sources at and before the time they filed suit, that establish that many of the unnamed defendants in the above-referenced case (hereinafter "Does") use Internet connections physically located far from this District and therefore are likely not located in this District.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...................What?
I second that.Originally Posted by kleenr
Bookmarks