Bush asks courts to reinstate the DMCA subpoenas

**camoor** · March 4th, 2004, 02:03 PM

Please read the article below if you are even thinking about voting for Bush. The Bush administration wants to appeal the court's decision that the DMCA subpoenas were unconstitutional. Unbelievable.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/bus...n+Charter+case

**shawners** · March 4th, 2004, 02:23 PM

okay, bush NOW HAS TO GO!

**RJ5500** · March 4th, 2004, 02:23 PM

A vote for John Kerry (or anyone else that is NOT Bush) is looking very good right now.

This is just total bullshit. :finger

Believeable, but bullshit nonetheless.

Ralph Nader may never be president, but I fully support his stance against big corporate interests and those businesses paying off the government. :gj

**Lord_of_the_Dense** · March 4th, 2004, 03:02 PM

Now I really know why I'm voting for Kerry.

**damocles** · March 4th, 2004, 03:02 PM

Ha!
Really, is anyone reading this forum actually thinking of voting that retard Bush?
Nader would be a good choice, but now it is not his time.

**Lord_of_the_Dense** · March 4th, 2004, 03:04 PM

And neither was last time! lol

**a3ro3** · March 4th, 2004, 03:12 PM

C'mon, Kerry or Bush could care less about us. 18 to 25-year-olds don't really even vote. A democrat wouldn't erase the DMCA in the first place, when it was signed into law by one (Clinton).
Besides, I like Nader's consumer rights approach but he'll Never get elected. It's a two-party system, and neither care about downloaders' rights.

**RJ5500** · March 4th, 2004, 03:17 PM

The goal here then is to vote for the lesser of two evils.

At this stage, I'd say that would be the democratic or independant candidates.

**Aaron73153** · March 4th, 2004, 04:04 PM

I'm voting for Bush gotta problem :ass

**Psilaxs** · March 4th, 2004, 04:13 PM

Yes, bush has got to go. I was hoping Edwards would not have dropped out.

**Sephiroth** · March 4th, 2004, 04:34 PM

IMHO Kerry would do the same thing. The toughest laws to kill file sharing with ideas like requiring all digital devices to have copy protection all came from democrats.

So i dont see how there would be any difference especially since it came from the Dept. of Justice and not directly from Bush or a top offical/cabinet member.

**thewhitrbbit** · March 4th, 2004, 04:51 PM

Kerry has said he's against stunting technological progress.

Please dont vote for nadar, ur only helping bush get elected by doing that.

Oh and I am an 18 year old male who votes.

**RJ5500** · March 4th, 2004, 04:56 PM

John Kerry does not have a positive stance on filesharing despite saying "he's against stunting technological progress".

http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/10502

**que-em** · March 4th, 2004, 05:12 PM

Lets be real. If you want someone on your side you probably want to look at Nader who takes a strong stance against the love affair of Washington and Corporations.

Neither party really gives a damn.

**Sephiroth** · March 4th, 2004, 05:15 PM

Originally Posted by thewhitrbbit

Kerry has said he's against stunting technological progress.

Please dont vote for nadar, ur only helping bush get elected by doing that.

Oh and I am an 18 year old male who votes.

Well im not voting Kerry no matter because i dont think he has a clue on what to do considering the only reason why he got nominated was by copying what Dean then Edwards was doing. He is too liberal IMO too and i remember when he said the south doesnt matter a few months ago. Nader and 3rd parties in general are a joke.

Nader is so out there, i have to wonder if he has been living under a rock for the past decade or something.