Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Download Speeds on WASTE?

  1. #1

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2

    Download Speeds on WASTE?

    What kind of download speeds are people getting on WASTE? My download speeds are about 10 mbps, much slower than on Kazaa Lite or when downloading from websites. I would think the speeds would be faster. Any advice on how to speed this up a bit? Or is 10 mbps a good speed for two people connected on DSL? Thanks.

  2. #2

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2

    Whoops

    I meant kbps, not mbps.. sorry

  3. #3
    vipp's Avatar

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,130
    On waste, you only get files from 1 source.
    Always be nice to those around you. After all, some day you might need CPR.......

  4. #4

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    177
    WASTE speeds depend entirely on the person you are downloading from. therefore, if that person has a 10KB/s cap, thats all youll get. if you want to download files at a faster speed, you have to download from a person with more upload bandwidth, or use a multi-sourcing client.

  5. #5
    origin's Avatar

    exploited of deleted.....

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    bay area, CA
    Posts
    1,132
    the rates(kb/s) are fairly good considering it does not have the luxury of multi-source downloading.

    l8
    like honestly, who does that?!?!

  6. #6

    Alpha Geek

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    724
    >Any advice on how to speed this up a bit?
    Persuade everyone in your waste mesh to configure their firewall, NAT router, connection sharing system and waste itself so that their waste clients can receive incoming connections.

    Turn on open direct connection for file transfers.

  7. #7
    DainBramaged's Avatar

    I have a twitch

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    636
    Specific speeds aside, WASTE is very efficient at transferring files. Much better than AIM or MSN, or even some P2P applications for a given bandwidth.

  8. #8

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    74
    Also, you gotta remember all that data is being encrypted and decryted again.... thats not gonna make it any faster is it? Just very secure. The speed is as fast as the users your dealing with. Get a waste network with a load of t3s, your well away!

  9. #9
    c4117

    Guest
    i agree with DrainBramaged i have got excelent speeds using W.A.S.T.E. and have not been slowed by encryption
    it's about people setting

    dirrect connections

    allow saturation

    change the uploads from 160(default) down to something reasonable

    and having a open listen port (in there router or firewall)

    also asking people who download from you to change downloads from 4 at once (default) to 1 helps

    and of course the up and down speed of each and what else is going on on each conection matters too.

    for instance on the nullnet mesh (no ID) only 3 or 4 people have open listen ports and this really hurts the network speed wise.

  10. #10
    Kyle06's Avatar

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,858
    waste is too confuseing for me to use hell I can't learn mIRC (not that I tried hard) but I am not even going to try this lol
    -NEVER ARGUE WITH A FOOL; HE WILL SOON BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE

    -EAT AND SLEEP. YOU MIGHT THINK THAT'S A GIVEN BUT NO-IT'S NOT. EAT AND SLEEP. IDIOT.

  11. #11

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1
    I set up a nice WASTE mesh on my college campus, 30-80 people, 1300-2500GB.

    I've found that file transfer speeds are limited to 2000kB/sec when you're using a 1024 bit key. It's limited to 1100kB/sec when you're using a default 1536 bit key.

    Is there any way that I can trick WASTE into generating, say, a 64 bit key? That would really help improve transfer speeds. I know that we're capable of doing 6000+kB/sec on this LAN.

    I've also been told that the code can be modified to increase memory buffers and CPU usage (which would be an alternate solution), but this, of course, would not be desirable.

    Also, I've noticed that the client automatically routes some data through other, secondary connections, rather than transferring the file completely through one direct connection. Why does it do this? It seems to me that it would increase the chances of data corruption. Plus, it slows down transfer speeds to as low as 300kB/sec.

  12. #12
    Rajarius's Avatar

    Registered User

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    121
    Privacy. It helps to keep other lines partially saturated.

  13. #13
    multi's Avatar

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    515

    Exclamation buggy transfer window speeds

    if you are reading 10k/s in the transfer window-
    have a look in the network status window at what the incoming speed that that tells you not the transfer window speed
    i have seen it say 10k and a check in netstatus window will tell me 27 or 30k/s
    note: the small "k"
    Blog
    NAPFOOD
    feed yourself some news



  14. #14

    Expatriate Australian

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Vermont USA
    Posts
    306
    sh4rd the WASTE development lead at sourceforge has promised Multisource and partials with WASTE 2. I wonder what other goodies they will throw in .There are nightly Builds that have some inprovements go to the sourceforge site to see more details.

  15. #15

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3

    k/s speed

    What does the k/s mean ?
    kilobit/s or kiloByte/s ?
    Thanks in advance for the answer !
    Regards.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. bittorrent speeds slow and just help
    By click in forum BitTorrent
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: August 9th, 2005, 06:30 AM
  2. will waste be continued?
    By random in forum Anonymous P2P
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: December 9th, 2003, 01:25 PM
  3. Should I switch from DC to WASTE?
    By goweropolis in forum Anonymous P2P
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: November 18th, 2003, 05:36 AM
  4. multiple instances of WASTE
    By retribution in forum Anonymous P2P
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: November 4th, 2003, 06:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •