Gnutella / Edonkey Client with WASTE method is out: EÉTEE 1,0

[scenario]

http://www.eetee.com/

[begoodbebad]

http://www.eetee.com/

Well the principle looks ok....any clever people out there see any holes? I'm downloading it now and might give it a try later this week....when the edonkey has finished his bag of carrots.

The website though has a faint hint of ES5 about it.....house style?

[mr.jip]

it looks decent, i dunno about performance, ill give it a download to. This was posted on slyck.com on the release part but it said it was only for mac...

[mr.jip]

......9.5 meg, wtf has this client got inside of it..?!

[mr.jip]

$15.....woot

[notbob]

and this works how?

magic?

or is it just as slow as shit?

i'd guess the second one

it's a fancied up pay version of mldonkey i'd guess, which is why it's only on mac

[begoodbebad]

and this works how?

magic?

or is it just as slow as shit?

i'd guess the second one

it's a fancied up pay version of mldonkey i'd guess, which is why it's only on mac

It is apparently for windows and linux too. The download was free, payment seems optional like edonkey.

[Ea$y_E]

i tried it and well.....

heres the break down.

connects to G1, BT, edonkey, and opennap

G1 - average speed 2Kbps - 6MB file - overall bleh! performance.

BT - average speed 60Kbps - 18MB file - S:5/ L:11, average use overall.

ED2K - average speed 16Kbps - queue wait 10 - 15secs before transfer, speed was constant till finish. overall better than average performance compared to regular ed2k/emule client, similar to overnet in performance.

opennap - average speed 17Kbps - 12MB file - constant speed no wait time. average overall performance.

Pros:

- descent multi-network client with a mass variety of available files.

- GUI is simple and not very cluttered or bloated.

- source IP of files is hard to determine due to so many connections from the start.

- browsing is very similar to current ed2k programs where the search items are tabbed between different searches.

- for being a multi-network program, has the ability to keep different network transfers separate, unlike say shareaza where a G2 file can spring up ed2k sources if ed2k is enabled and slow you down.

Cons:

- system resources required may be a little much for the average users pc or just meeting the requirements.

- broadband only, due to so many connections high speed is needed to send and recieve packets efficiently.

- you cant selectively connect to networks, ALL 4 networks are always connected with out an option to disconnect from any of them.

- preferences are lacking, nothing there except clean cache on restart, and update group configuration nothing more is available.

- no superpeers as of yet, full performance/potential is not seen yet.

- windowed interface, have to always drag windows around to view search, transfers and all, annoyance is minimal but its something rather tedious most people would dislike.

- space theme - eetee, (ET) plain icons, looks like something a 5 yr old would draw up and color in with crayons. overall an OK showing here when compared to a certain other space themed p2p program *cough*

*overall eetee seems to manage well, can sustain and handle a vast list of connections and not put a burden on transfer speed at the same time, project is a beta and shows good standing so far future efforts look to be well made.

[Nothingface5384]

i tried it and well.....

heres the break down.

connects to G1, BT, edonkey, and opennap

G1 - average speed 2Kbps - 6MB file - overall bleh! performance.

BT - average speed 60Kbps - 18MB file - S:5/ L:11, average use overall.

ED2K - average speed 16Kbps - queue wait 10 - 15secs before transfer, speed was constant till finish. overall better than average performance compared to regular ed2k/emule client, similar to overnet in performance.

opennap - average speed 17Kbps - 12MB file - constant speed no wait time. average overall performance.

Pros:

- descent multi-network client with a mass variety of available files.

- GUI is simple and not very cluttered or bloated.

- source IP of files is hard to determine due to so many connections from the start.

- browsing is very similar to current ed2k programs where the search items are tabbed between different searches.

- for being a multi-network program, has the ability to keep different network transfers separate, unlike say shareaza where a G2 file can spring up ed2k sources if ed2k is enabled and slow you down.

Cons:

- system resources required may be a little much for the average users pc or just meeting the requirements.

- broadband only, due to so many connections high speed is needed to send and recieve packets efficiently.

- you cant selectively connect to networks, ALL 4 networks are always connected with out an option to disconnect from any of them.

- preferences are lacking, nothing there except clean cache on restart, and update group configuration nothing more is available.

- no superpeers as of yet, full performance/potential is not seen yet.

- windowed interface, have to always drag windows around to view search, transfers and all, annoyance is minimal but its something rather tedious most people would dislike.

- space theme - eetee, (ET) plain icons, looks like something a 5 yr old would draw up and color in with crayons. overall an OK showing here when compared to a certain other space themed p2p program *cough*

*overall eetee seems to manage well, can sustain and handle a vast list of connections and not put a burden on transfer speed at the same time, project is a beta and shows good standing so far future efforts look to be well made.

thanks for the low down cypher...the chats are WASTE networks right?...oh.., as for ed2k support..does it support emules credit system..or kademlia protocol?

[Ea$y_E]

yea the chats are based on the same principle as the WASTE network style where you create and have people join, but theres also a catagory based chat system where you can join rooms of a particular interest such as hardware, entertainment and such, as for eetee using/referencing or honoring the emule credit system, doesnt seem like it, and kademlia is still being worked on so i would hope not or it would be very poorly implemented.

[Kevin33134]

Oh bull, the chats are not based on WASTE.

They're based on the JXTA protocol by Sun Microsystems. That's what the groups are.

[Ne007]

Where's the .exe file? I can't find any way of starting this program.

(i downloaded the java file needed)

[Ea$y_E]

i didnt say its based on WASTE, i said its based with the same principle and style that WASTE also uses for creating and joining channels, thats it!, he asked if the chat rooms are WASTE networks, i didnt say "YES" all i said was that it was among the same lines.

FFS some people here seriously need to relax and learn to fuckin READ!! before saying shit

[scenario]

help the network to get more superpeers.
make up one server !

[notbob]

yeah all you RIAA goons! make it easy pickins and become superpeers?

then all you need to do is log all the traffic through you get and send out the letters

how frigging irresponsible is it to publically invite people to be the spine of your network? how is this more secure than anything we have now?