I have just downloaded Shareaza and it has A great interface It has cool options and stuff to do it is kinda better then kazaa lite BUT it is hooked up to Gnutella and I don't know if it is just the program itself or Gnutella but the Transfers are so slow and there is not many songs and when people post stuff they usally say Kazaa Lite is better what if Shareaza wasn't on gnutella and was on fastTrack then would more people talk about shareaza becouse the way i see it not many people have this program that don't have Kazaa Lite and shareaza is alot better set up Program then Kazaa Lite (With the Hits and Upload thing) but Gnutella Takes this down alot
I imagine so but it depends what network the developer is loyal to and fasttrack costs money to be on or somethin
LordoftheDense: Robert's a std and didn't even know it
<note>evilmegaman=Robert</note>
Me:people like your grouchy side.sometimes I think there's a group of guys on the forum in the same room jerking eachother off to your mean posts
Potato:EW
and btw, lol
Me:xD
I think that won't happen, at least in the near future. Each network uses different protocols, and this would mean to change the skeleton of the program.
Ivan
"In the dark we make a brighter light"
Freedom is the freedom to say two plus two equals four
If that is granted, all else follows
Sharman Networks would never allow another client, especially one with different (and better) features. Besides, Gnutella itself will keep improving as clients like Shareaza push the network ahead.
an eagle in your mind
Shareza just needs to learn to play nice and limit the number of ultrapeers the leaves can connect too.
It does! It limits them to ten! but it should be limited to 8 though...
LordoftheDense: Robert's a std and didn't even know it
<note>evilmegaman=Robert</note>
Me:people like your grouchy side.sometimes I think there's a group of guys on the forum in the same room jerking eachother off to your mean posts
Potato:EW
and btw, lol
Me:xD
Bookmarks