Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: good news Verizon Challenges Music Download Decision

  1. #1

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    p2pconsortium.com i live
    Posts
    6,446

    good news Verizon Challenges Music Download Decision

    hmm read it there
    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...nloading_music
    heh i will post it here
    partially
    WASHINGTON - An Internet company wants a federal appeals panel to help disarm lawyers for the music industry, blocking them from using special copyright subpoenas in a campaign to track and sue computer users who download songs online.

    -------
    sounds good to me

  2. #2
    Malicious Intent's Avatar

    People on my cool list...

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    3,122
    Its an appeal case, so don't get your hopes up. Judges don't like to undermine eachother, however wrong they were.

    In saying that, good luck to them!
    I'm not really malicious. I'm a nice guy.
    If you are even slightly concerned about your BT speeds, please check this thread.
    SuprNova and LokiTorrent Alternatives - reliable sites, no registrations, no foreign languages. Constantly updated.

  3. #3
    aqlo's Avatar

    Cartoon Superhero

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    2,125

    Thumbs up That IS good news

    Turn their phones off guys. Make them do everything by mail, then their fraud will be what

    Judges love to undermine each other, the ones who are really good at it get to be appeals judges.

  4. #4

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coral Springs, Florida, US
    Posts
    810
    Cross your fingers guys...

    The RIAA clogs up the legal system anyway, the nation has more important things to worry about then 12 yr old convicts on the lose.

    Finally they might get their priorities straight.

  5. #5
    aqlo's Avatar

    Cartoon Superhero

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    2,125
    Here's a link to dub's post
    http://www.zeropaid.com/news/article.../09162003a.php

    "Isn't is equivalent to my leaving the door to my library open?" Roberts asked. "Somebody could come in and copy my books but that doesn't mean I'm liable for copyright infringement."
    Go Judge Roberts :gj

  6. #6
    Pebbles100's Avatar

    Enjoy the silence

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    361
    Quote:

    "Sen. Sam Brownback , R-Kan., said he planned to introduce a bill Tuesday to protect Internet providers from such subpoenas. His proposal would block subpoenas except in pending civil lawsuits or in cases where pirated data files were stored on computers such as Web sites."

    If that gets passed, what happens next?

  7. #7

    Zeropaid Noob

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    p2pconsortium.com i live
    Posts
    6,446
    [QUOTE]Originally posted by aqlo
    [B]Here's a link to dub's post
    http://www.zeropaid.com/news/article.../09162003a.php

    heh i posted this here first though :)
    then i submitted it as news. not that it matters but i didnt want people to get the indication that i am a spammer.
    *although i am * lmao
    but really all good n the hood

  8. #8
    shawners's Avatar

    Hurt no more my son.

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    An angel in Heaven and on Earth
    Posts
    7,899
    Sounds to me that they want a cheaper way to file lawsuits and obtain subpoenas.. Rather then the costly, have the judge sign that they must do first is too much to spend.

  9. #9
    aqlo's Avatar

    Cartoon Superhero

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    2,125
    *although i am * lmao
    You're the best, I just crosslinked to quote the Judge. You rule this story!

    Here's more content I swiped from Mr King
    http://news.com.com/2100-1027_3-5077240.html

    The three judges spent little time on Verizon's sweeping claims that the expedited subpoenas could endanger privacy and free speech, instead choosing to examine the minutiae of the DMCA, what Congress intended to say when drafting the law, and whether permitting subpoenas in the absence of a lawsuit agreed with the U.S. Constitution's requirement of an actual "case or controversy." Scott McIntosh, an appellate lawyer with the U.S. Justice Department, assured the court that "we don't think the constitutional questions are substantial ones."

    Tuesday's arguments come as scrutiny of the DMCA subpoena process is growing. During a hearing Sept. 9, some senators said they were paying close attention to how it was being used, and Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., has indicated he may introduce a bill on Tuesday to amend the DMCA to immunize Internet service providers from such subpoenas.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •