What Was better Audiogalaxy/Napster

**PuNiShErKiLl666** · July 26th, 2002, 06:04 AM

What was better Napster or Audiogalaxy everybody always compare the 2 so what one is better

**PuNiShErKiLl666** · July 26th, 2002, 10:01 AM

wow

**Music Pirate** · July 26th, 2002, 11:50 AM

The only thing that Audiogalaxy had over Napster was you never had to worry about being disconnected, it just kept looking for new sources. With Audiogalaxy you could download all your music, go to bed and wake up with new music. But Audiogalaxy you could get the old plus the new music.

**TC75580** · July 26th, 2002, 01:40 PM

Audiogalaxy was great for its sheer number of files available. The thing is, the blocking system took out a lot of potential downloads and kept it from being the best music file-sharing program ever. Until AG finally blocked those songs from being shared in groups, you COULD get any song you ever wanted to. No program ever matched the number of rare mp3s and remixes that AG had. Also, I gained so much music knowledge from AG. The ability to click a few times and have a 100 songs queued up was unbelievable.

**jabba|xtra** · August 12th, 2002, 12:23 PM

napster was the best, hands down. I never liked ag due to its web interface.

**evilmegaman** · August 12th, 2002, 02:53 PM

Napster was way better! AG was slow and stupid!:mellow

**mojo-ris-in** · September 4th, 2002, 01:20 AM

:devil I liked the speed and simplicity of napster but AG was great for the songs I could find

**ashep612** · September 4th, 2002, 11:32 AM

I myself liked Napster, I could find everything that I wanted and it was easy, however I never tried AG because of the web interface and why should I have when I had Napster? Why am I even replying to this post if I didn't use AG? Sorry for the lack of intelligent input!:upside

**JordySchmit** · September 4th, 2002, 11:38 AM

i prefered napsters interface as it was not web based however i believe ag was better due to the amount of files and the rare music you were able to find

**kevin o** · September 4th, 2002, 01:40 PM

I never had a chance to use Napster, but I was impressed with the fact that I found every song I couldn't find elsewhere on AG.:fire :fire :fire

**AnimeDood** · September 4th, 2002, 02:19 PM

i liked both, but i liked AG better! it had everything that i wanted.

**Faye Valentine** · September 21st, 2002, 02:41 PM

I really liked AG. Though I never had a chance to try Napster myself, I've heard great things about it, so to me, both will be missed. :(

**K1W169** · September 21st, 2002, 03:57 PM

Napster was much better

AG was like Aol lol

**CCSDUDE** · September 22nd, 2002, 07:13 AM

Napster was the best I found ANYTHING an EVERYTHING I ever wanted on Napster, only downside was if you got a transfer error you had to start over. But the interface kicked ass - simple yet functional. I would have liked KL or morphues to have the same look with the added features - resume DL's all types of files. But oddly enough I wouldn't want to change anything on the old napster even if it meant mp3's were the only thing to DL since there was a shit load of rare file's that I haven't found on any other P2P network since then. Damn metalica that prick dug himself a deep hole when he pulled that shit, anyone get the scoop on that hacks CD sales? I bet there down to shit

Peace all, Later