Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Why the .BIN format over the .ISO format?

  1. #1
    tlogank's Avatar

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    55

    Why the .BIN format over the .ISO format?

    Just a curious question, and I have a feeling there is a good explanation, but I would like to know it......

    But how come whenever you download the CD-Images off Sharelive.com and other P2P client hash sites, the format is always with a .Bin extension?
    Because I have noticed that whenever I download them, I convert them with WinISO over from a .BIN to a .ISO and it shaves almost 100MB's off most images. and that's a good few hours difference downloading a 679MB file over a 779MB file. They always work when I convert the images over, so I am just confused on why these sites and others would rather use a larger file format, especially when you downloading an image even though it works that same as another, only smaller?
    If someone could just give me a logical explanation for this, that would be great.

    Thanks!
    "You don't quit playing because you grow old, you grow old because you quit playing."

    My Moblog

    Mom's Site

  2. #2

    ZeroPaid Regular

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    152
    Because they use a program to mess around with .bin files like adding a crack removing protections. Which can't be done that easily with .iso. Also the parameters to add a file to a .bin file are very easy (when using linux).
    Currently using eMule 0.42c

  3. #3
    nasrules's Avatar

    PeerWebmaster

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    localhost
    Posts
    2,405
    Good question. And good answer! Thanks Andy!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •